Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1864

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:16, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1864_argyrophil_merkel_small_gastrointestinal_smallcell_migratory_nonsmall



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:20345174..20345187,+p@chr20:20345174..20345187
+
Hg19::chr20:20345188..20345217,+p@chr20:20345188..20345217
+
Hg19::chr20:20348740..20348757,+p1@INSM1
Hg19::chr20:20351080..20351098,+p@chr20:20351080..20351098
+
Hg19::chr8:145753950..145753973,-p3@C8orf82


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0031018endocrine pancreas development0.00662310137760508
GO:0031016pancreas development0.00662310137760508
GO:0035270endocrine system development0.0145708230307312



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neural cell2.91e-0825
neuronal stem cell1.68e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system9.88e-4282
regional part of nervous system1.32e-4094
nervous system1.32e-4094
neural tube7.89e-3757
neural rod7.89e-3757
future spinal cord7.89e-3757
neural keel7.89e-3757
brain2.66e-3369
future brain2.66e-3369
regional part of brain1.61e-3159
anterior neural tube9.15e-3042
regional part of forebrain2.00e-2941
forebrain2.00e-2941
future forebrain2.00e-2941
neurectoderm5.32e-2990
neural plate2.66e-2786
presumptive neural plate2.66e-2786
telencephalon3.68e-2434
gray matter4.37e-2434
brain grey matter4.37e-2434
ectoderm7.86e-24173
presumptive ectoderm7.86e-24173
regional part of telencephalon1.35e-2333
cerebral hemisphere3.12e-2332
pre-chordal neural plate1.19e-2261
ectoderm-derived structure2.48e-22169
adult organism2.60e-20115
anterior region of body3.88e-20129
craniocervical region3.88e-20129
head6.74e-19123
cerebral cortex1.42e-1825
pallium1.42e-1825
regional part of cerebral cortex1.08e-1622
neocortex2.39e-1520
posterior neural tube2.85e-0815
chordal neural plate2.85e-0815
basal ganglion2.40e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.40e-079
aggregate regional part of brain2.40e-079
collection of basal ganglia2.40e-079
cerebral subcortex2.40e-079
embryo2.58e-07612
temporal lobe2.59e-077
segmental subdivision of hindbrain5.14e-0712
hindbrain5.14e-0712
presumptive hindbrain5.14e-0712
nucleus of brain5.89e-079
neural nucleus5.89e-079
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
germ cell and embryonal cancer3.71e-0822
germ cell cancer3.71e-0822
cell type cancer3.02e-07143
neuroectodermal tumor6.30e-0710


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.