Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1738

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:15, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1738_CD19_CD14_Basophils_CD34_Mast_Peripheral_Dendritic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:40391052..40391084,-p@chr15:40391052..40391084
-
Hg19::chr15:40391166..40391171,+p@chr15:40391166..40391171
+
Hg19::chr15:40391226..40391245,+p@chr15:40391226..40391245
+
Hg19::chr6:14729941..14729960,-p@chr6:14729941..14729960
-
Hg19::chr6:32995875..32995899,+p@chr6:32995875..32995899
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte9.66e-43140
hematopoietic stem cell2.20e-40172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.20e-40172
hematopoietic cell5.19e-38182
nongranular leukocyte2.29e-36119
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.56e-36165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.56e-36165
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell8.97e-36124
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.32e-3142
classical monocyte7.34e-2845
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell5.56e-2671
myeloid leukocyte6.07e-2476
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor9.11e-2465
myeloid cell4.55e-23112
common myeloid progenitor4.55e-23112
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell9.24e-2370
monopoietic cell1.36e-2263
monocyte1.36e-2263
monoblast1.36e-2263
promonocyte1.36e-2263
mesenchymal cell2.84e-18358
connective tissue cell1.67e-17365
motile cell1.44e-16390
lymphocyte of B lineage3.16e-1324
pro-B cell3.16e-1324
lymphocyte6.81e-1253
common lymphoid progenitor6.81e-1253
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.09e-1152
multi fate stem cell8.51e-11430
stem cell2.01e-10444
somatic stem cell3.19e-10436
B cell5.64e-1014
intermediate monocyte5.42e-089
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte5.42e-089
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.27e-26102
blood island1.27e-26102
bone element4.79e-2486
bone marrow5.02e-2480
hemolymphoid system5.83e-24112
immune system2.85e-18115
skeletal element8.93e-18101
skeletal system8.93e-18101
connective tissue4.83e-17375


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.