Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1308

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:09, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1308_CD14_CD4_Basophils_Peripheral_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_CD8



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:23727926..23727957,+p4@OTUD1
Hg19::chr10:23727989..23728040,+p2@OTUD1
Hg19::chr10:23728041..23728084,+p3@OTUD1
Hg19::chr15:63796779..63796863,+p1@USP3
Hg19::chr15:63796867..63796887,+p2@USP3
Hg19::chr15:63796904..63796916,+p4@USP3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004221ubiquitin thiolesterase activity0.0316849169904627
GO:0004843ubiquitin-specific protease activity0.0316849169904627
GO:0019783small conjugating protein-specific protease activity0.0316849169904627
GO:0016790thiolester hydrolase activity0.0316849169904627
GO:0006511ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process0.0316849169904627
GO:0043632modification-dependent macromolecule catabolic process0.0316849169904627
GO:0019941modification-dependent protein catabolic process0.0316849169904627
GO:0051603proteolysis involved in cellular protein catabolic process0.0316849169904627
GO:0044257cellular protein catabolic process0.0316849169904627
GO:0008234cysteine-type peptidase activity0.0316849169904627
GO:0030163protein catabolic process0.0342956231334896
GO:0043285biopolymer catabolic process0.0400918403391028
GO:0044265cellular macromolecule catabolic process0.0415552303577736
GO:0006512ubiquitin cycle0.0415552303577736
GO:0009057macromolecule catabolic process0.0441540091840339



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte1.10e-39140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.21e-32124
nongranular leukocyte6.21e-32119
myeloid leukocyte2.55e-3076
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte7.82e-2742
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.15e-2671
classical monocyte5.60e-2645
hematopoietic stem cell2.85e-25172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.85e-25172
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.03e-2565
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.96e-2470
monopoietic cell2.39e-2463
monocyte2.39e-2463
monoblast2.39e-2463
promonocyte2.39e-2463
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.46e-23165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.46e-23165
hematopoietic cell2.72e-21182
myeloid cell1.31e-15112
common myeloid progenitor1.31e-15112
mature alpha-beta T cell7.56e-0918
alpha-beta T cell7.56e-0918
immature T cell7.56e-0918
mature T cell7.56e-0918
immature alpha-beta T cell7.56e-0918
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.97e-0852
lymphocyte1.37e-0753
common lymphoid progenitor1.37e-0753
intermediate monocyte9.66e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte9.66e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.83e-25102
blood island2.83e-25102
hemolymphoid system1.49e-23112
bone marrow9.04e-2180
bone element3.92e-1986
immune system9.24e-16115
skeletal element3.85e-13101
skeletal system3.85e-13101
adult organism2.08e-07115


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.