Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2121

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:56, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr14:79826217..79826260,+p1@Kbtbd7
Mm9::chr5:65884164..65884209,-p2@1110003E01Rik
Mm9::chr9:121614114..121614159,-p1@Sec22c
Mm9::chr9:26837595..26837699,-p1@Vps26b


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0030904retromer complex0.0123253901067192
GO:0007034vacuolar transport0.0328443011797946



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system1.14e-3073
ectoderm-derived structure3.65e-2995
ectoderm3.65e-2995
presumptive ectoderm3.65e-2995
nervous system3.09e-2875
neurectoderm3.93e-2864
neural plate3.93e-2864
presumptive neural plate3.93e-2864
regional part of nervous system1.08e-2754
ecto-epithelium2.53e-2773
neural tube1.74e-2652
neural rod1.74e-2652
future spinal cord1.74e-2652
neural keel1.74e-2652
brain6.38e-2447
future brain6.38e-2447
regional part of brain2.19e-2346
pre-chordal neural plate2.10e-2249
anterior neural tube1.03e-2040
regional part of forebrain3.65e-2039
forebrain3.65e-2039
future forebrain3.65e-2039
gray matter1.73e-1934
brain grey matter3.97e-1729
regional part of telencephalon3.97e-1729
telencephalon3.97e-1729
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.31e-1392
cerebral cortex9.56e-1321
cerebral hemisphere9.56e-1321
pallium9.56e-1321
regional part of cerebral cortex2.53e-1017
anatomical conduit5.06e-07122
occipital lobe5.97e-0710
visual cortex5.97e-0710
neocortex5.97e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}