Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1301

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:42, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:70577930..70577985,+p1@Zfp3
Mm9::chr3:36049985..36050034,+p1@D3Ertd254e
Mm9::chr4:53727014..53727071,+p1@Fktn
Mm9::chr4:58924785..58924817,-p2@AI314180
Mm9::chr5:29704877..29704941,-p1@Lmbr1
Mm9::chr5:74464386..74464463,-p1@Usp46


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.08e-1892
ecto-epithelium1.16e-1473
neurectoderm7.31e-1464
neural plate7.31e-1464
presumptive neural plate7.31e-1464
anatomical conduit3.18e-13122
multi-cellular organism7.44e-13333
regional part of nervous system1.13e-1254
ectoderm-derived structure1.83e-1295
ectoderm1.83e-1295
presumptive ectoderm1.83e-1295
neural tube3.90e-1252
neural rod3.90e-1252
future spinal cord3.90e-1252
neural keel3.90e-1252
pre-chordal neural plate2.17e-1149
tube4.36e-11114
brain8.45e-1147
future brain8.45e-1147
regional part of brain3.06e-1046
central nervous system8.60e-1073
anterior neural tube1.88e-0940
nervous system5.50e-0975
regional part of forebrain7.02e-0939
forebrain7.02e-0939
future forebrain7.02e-0939
gray matter2.30e-0834
occipital lobe1.28e-0710
visual cortex1.28e-0710
neocortex1.28e-0710
brain grey matter4.01e-0729
regional part of telencephalon4.01e-0729
telencephalon4.01e-0729
embryo7.82e-07320


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}