MCL coexpression mm9:527

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

	Short description
Mm9::chr11:44333836..44333845,+	p11@Rnf145
Mm9::chr2:49585812..49585827,-	p@chr2:49585812..49585827 -
Mm9::chr4:135728233..135728238,-	p@chr4:135728233..135728238 -
Mm9::chr4:135728282..135728310,+	p4@E2f2
Mm9::chr5:89194174..89194185,+	p3@Dck
Mm9::chr5:89194194..89194216,+	p1@Dck
Mm9::chr5:89194217..89194224,+	p5@Dck
Mm9::chr5:89194225..89194236,+	p4@Dck
Mm9::chr5:89194237..89194248,+	p2@Dck
Mm9::chr5:89194874..89194877,+	p@chr5:89194874..89194877 +
Mm9::chr7:106976854..106976894,-	p1@Neu3
Mm9::chr8:124471852..124471879,+	p@chr8:124471852..124471879 +
Mm9::chr9:72286416..72286423,+	p3@Mns1
Mm9::chr9:72286650..72286653,+	p@chr9:72286650..72286653 +

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

GO ID	GO name	FDR corrected p-value
GO:0004137	deoxycytidine kinase activity	0.0279406125020544
GO:0016997	alpha-sialidase activity	0.0419017343081136
GO:0019136	deoxynucleoside kinase activity	0.0465472798622322

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:

---

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br><br><br>

---

TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}