Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4391

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:43, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4391_mucinous_mesenchymal_Preadipocyte_stomach_Mesothelial_Smooth_duodenum



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:169013681..169013697,+p1@ANXA10
Hg19::chr4:169013698..169013709,+p3@ANXA10
Hg19::chr4:169013766..169013773,+p5@ANXA10


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
systemic artery5.93e-1633
systemic arterial system5.93e-1633
artery2.33e-1342
arterial blood vessel2.33e-1342
arterial system2.33e-1342
artery wall3.75e-104
tunica adventitia of artery3.75e-104
adventitia3.75e-104
tunica adventitia of blood vessel3.75e-104
aorta tunica adventitia3.75e-104
aorta wall3.75e-104
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.74e-0983
skeletal muscle tissue1.27e-0862
striated muscle tissue1.27e-0862
myotome1.27e-0862
trunk mesenchyme2.08e-08122
aorta2.78e-0821
aortic system2.78e-0821
epithelial tube open at both ends2.85e-0859
blood vessel2.85e-0859
blood vasculature2.85e-0859
vascular cord2.85e-0859
muscle tissue3.23e-0864
musculature3.23e-0864
musculature of body3.23e-0864
epithelial tube9.70e-08117
reproductive structure1.13e-0759
reproductive system1.13e-0759
somite5.44e-0771
presomitic mesoderm5.44e-0771
presumptive segmental plate5.44e-0771
dermomyotome5.44e-0771
trunk paraxial mesoderm5.44e-0771
vasculature6.91e-0778
vascular system6.91e-0778
paraxial mesoderm7.76e-0772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm7.76e-0772
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer3.46e-1314
cell type benign neoplasm5.21e-083
leiomyoma5.21e-083


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.