Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4328

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:41, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4328_Reticulocytes_Mast_small_Melanocyte_CD4_CD19_Macrophage



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:42623743..42623756,-p4@SEC22C
Hg19::chr3:42623766..42623775,-p9@SEC22C
Hg19::chr3:42623776..42623801,-p3@SEC22C


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid leukocyte8.70e-2872
hematopoietic stem cell2.72e-27168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.72e-27168
myeloid cell3.77e-27108
common myeloid progenitor3.77e-27108
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.46e-2666
hematopoietic cell2.15e-26177
leukocyte7.08e-26136
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell7.82e-2667
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell8.23e-26161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell8.23e-26161
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell8.69e-24120
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor7.27e-2361
defensive cell3.52e-2248
phagocyte3.52e-2248
monopoietic cell7.44e-2259
monocyte7.44e-2259
monoblast7.44e-2259
promonocyte7.44e-2259
nongranular leukocyte6.48e-20115
classical monocyte2.61e-1942
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.61e-1942
stuff accumulating cell8.53e-1587
mesenchymal cell2.08e-11354
connective tissue cell3.04e-10361
motile cell3.51e-09386
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system6.86e-2498
blood island6.86e-2498
bone marrow1.31e-2376
hemolymphoid system1.13e-22108
immune system8.42e-2193
bone element4.47e-2082
skeletal element1.11e-1790
skeletal system7.64e-16100
connective tissue4.82e-09371
lateral plate mesoderm4.75e-08203


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0190657441475594
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280554087405244
CTCFL#140690319.74647435897440.0001298372005551160.00172147611892546
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326711594143652
E2F4#1874312.66806031528440.0004917987006298980.0043813839883209
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0323481777809339
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00917704595295246
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0321714294020108
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0463927327814344
GATA1#2623313.56030814380040.0004009615963782630.00388821060019958
GATA2#2624312.7449317335540.0004829527704283790.00438067608049067
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0108961785303207
JUNB#3726330.61063265982113.4847716247536e-050.000681674590218471
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0157255642575728
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0187115124163308
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.029545084253596
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.027031977898564
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.0066661753051538
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0277661591223265
SMARCB1#6598318.25271578115740.000164397760679890.00203551128958471
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00310119015958549
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0247352614543593
TAL1#6886329.86861667744023.75103522793067e-050.000720931851619159
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.0063058764762344
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.0024900488065501
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00617673013316212
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190873947578434
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00422517746801142
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109742625163352



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.