Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3885

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:24, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3885_B_chronic_NK_cord_plasma_CD4_acute



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:158978768..158978800,+p8@IFI16
Hg19::chr1:158978805..158978820,+p23@IFI16
Hg19::chr1:158978830..158978851,+p22@IFI16


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic cell7.86e-37177
hematopoietic stem cell1.14e-35168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.14e-35168
lymphocyte3.15e-3553
common lymphoid progenitor3.15e-3553
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.43e-3452
nucleate cell1.86e-3355
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.90e-32161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.90e-32161
leukocyte1.93e-27136
nongranular leukocyte2.48e-25115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.12e-23120
T cell2.11e-2325
pro-T cell2.11e-2325
mature alpha-beta T cell3.06e-1718
alpha-beta T cell3.06e-1718
immature T cell3.06e-1718
mature T cell3.06e-1718
immature alpha-beta T cell3.06e-1718
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.37e-1611
motile cell6.90e-11386
mesenchymal cell5.10e-10354
lymphocyte of B lineage8.15e-1024
pro-B cell8.15e-1024
connective tissue cell2.07e-09361
myeloid cell5.82e-07108
common myeloid progenitor5.82e-07108
circulating cell6.45e-076
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
connective tissue5.85e-10371
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer2.23e-1851
immune system cancer2.23e-1851
leukemia1.36e-1239
lymphoma2.75e-0910
myeloid leukemia4.67e-0731


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCL11A#53335328.36945510360714.37778126761649e-050.000777834463777813
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00915657924162138
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0167506497756564
ETS1#211339.728760922202340.001085840092584840.00762687829911008
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0269708169667124
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0172993474082319
POU2F2#545239.106124057742520.001324165192682130.00882486685971086
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0246628413128875
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.00629536058593905
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0329564186177381



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.