Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3141

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:57, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3141_small_mesenchymal_putamen_anaplastic_leiomyoma_gall_Smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:32112431..32112454,+p5@RCN1
Hg19::chr11:32112459..32112518,+p2@RCN1
Hg19::chr11:32112533..32112554,+p6@RCN1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
somite1.75e-1971
presomitic mesoderm1.75e-1971
presumptive segmental plate1.75e-1971
dermomyotome1.75e-1971
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.75e-1971
dense mesenchyme tissue2.46e-1973
paraxial mesoderm6.31e-1972
presumptive paraxial mesoderm6.31e-1972
multilaminar epithelium1.93e-1883
epithelial vesicle4.00e-1878
skeletal muscle tissue3.72e-1762
striated muscle tissue3.72e-1762
myotome3.72e-1762
mesenchyme1.33e-16160
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.33e-16160
muscle tissue5.65e-1664
musculature5.65e-1664
musculature of body5.65e-1664
trunk mesenchyme5.85e-15122
unilaminar epithelium1.90e-13148
vasculature1.99e-1278
vascular system1.99e-1278
organism subdivision7.95e-12264
trunk1.57e-11199
cell layer3.09e-11309
epithelium6.50e-11306
multi-tissue structure1.12e-10342
anatomical cluster3.52e-09373
vessel6.52e-0968
multi-cellular organism1.32e-08656
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.59e-0883
artery3.31e-0842
arterial blood vessel3.31e-0842
arterial system3.31e-0842
cardiovascular system1.37e-07109
epithelial tube open at both ends1.45e-0759
blood vessel1.45e-0759
blood vasculature1.45e-0759
vascular cord1.45e-0759
systemic artery3.94e-0733
systemic arterial system3.94e-0733
circulatory system4.24e-07112
epithelial tube6.36e-07117
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer1.29e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0323695684340208



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.