Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2975

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:51, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2975_CD14CD16_CD14_smallcell_cerebellum_eye_pineal_merkel



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:105314881..105314945,+p3@NEURL
Hg19::chr10:105315073..105315096,+p4@NEURL
Hg19::chr10:105315102..105315121,+p9@NEURL


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.20e-40114
neural tube6.72e-2456
neural rod6.72e-2456
future spinal cord6.72e-2456
neural keel6.72e-2456
regional part of nervous system1.23e-2353
regional part of brain1.23e-2353
regional part of forebrain4.09e-2041
forebrain4.09e-2041
anterior neural tube4.09e-2041
future forebrain4.09e-2041
brain7.81e-1868
future brain7.81e-1868
telencephalon6.37e-1634
brain grey matter6.67e-1634
gray matter6.67e-1634
central nervous system1.71e-1581
cerebral hemisphere2.00e-1532
regional part of telencephalon6.47e-1532
hematopoietic system9.22e-1598
blood island9.22e-1598
neocortex1.29e-1420
organ2.18e-14503
neural plate3.85e-1482
presumptive neural plate3.85e-1482
regional part of cerebral cortex4.17e-1422
nervous system4.57e-1489
neurectoderm1.01e-1286
hemolymphoid system2.71e-12108
pre-chordal neural plate8.17e-1261
multi-cellular organism8.73e-12656
bone element1.14e-1182
cerebral cortex1.43e-1125
pallium1.43e-1125
bone marrow3.32e-1176
embryo3.63e-11592
germ layer4.31e-10560
germ layer / neural crest4.31e-10560
embryonic tissue4.31e-10560
presumptive structure4.31e-10560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure4.31e-10560
epiblast (generic)4.31e-10560
embryonic structure4.35e-10564
anatomical system4.83e-10624
anatomical group6.20e-10625
organ system subdivision1.07e-09223
ecto-epithelium1.30e-09104
developing anatomical structure1.51e-09581
skeletal element2.37e-0990
immune system4.56e-0993
skeletal system1.79e-08100
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.91e-08132


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0323316691185955
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0318849355633101
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.00579235403371779
FOXA2#3170324.63046375266526.68983856509345e-050.00107011801179322
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0293030372459635
TRIM28#10155318.59052504526250.0001555969297255280.00196474280541704



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.