Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2360

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:27, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2360_Basophils_CD14_Mast_Natural_CD34_CD8_immature



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:15108296..15108333,+p@chr16:15108296..15108333
+
Hg19::chr16:70060239..70060250,-p@chr16:70060239..70060250
-
Hg19::chr19:13961988..13962001,-p@chr19:13961988..13962001
-
Hg19::chr6:135819555..135819564,-p@chr6:135819555..135819564
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte6.25e-4742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte6.25e-4742
defensive cell3.45e-4448
phagocyte3.45e-4448
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.59e-3967
myeloid leukocyte2.46e-3972
leukocyte9.78e-39136
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor7.60e-3761
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.87e-3566
monopoietic cell6.50e-3559
monocyte6.50e-3559
monoblast6.50e-3559
promonocyte6.50e-3559
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell6.10e-33120
nongranular leukocyte2.18e-32115
hematopoietic cell2.65e-29177
hematopoietic stem cell6.72e-29168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell6.72e-29168
stuff accumulating cell2.49e-2887
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.09e-25161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.09e-25161
myeloid cell9.48e-24108
common myeloid progenitor9.48e-24108
motile cell2.99e-18386
mesenchymal cell3.53e-17354
connective tissue cell9.87e-17361
multi fate stem cell1.18e-10427
intermediate monocyte2.38e-109
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte2.38e-109
stem cell2.88e-10441
somatic stem cell4.68e-10433
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.77e-076
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow3.03e-3776
bone element6.18e-3782
immune system5.87e-3393
hematopoietic system6.06e-3398
blood island6.06e-3398
skeletal element9.57e-3290
hemolymphoid system2.77e-31108
skeletal system1.78e-26100
connective tissue6.45e-17371
lateral plate mesoderm8.21e-11203
musculoskeletal system1.75e-09167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOS#235336.74846648167080.005032452776317940.023463586406512
FOSL1#8061219.85678985818650.003677050009233230.0185583253232644
JUN#3725412.51282919233634.07770316866756e-050.000742323934517119
JUNB#3726215.30531632991060.006126947148475620.0270968551022505



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.