Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1643

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:01, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1643_cerebellum_breast_pineal_spinal_acute_hippocampus_medulla



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:71791726..71791756,-p8@NUMA1
Hg19::chr1:150039659..150039684,-p@chr1:150039659..150039684
-
Hg19::chr1:61547894..61547968,+p2@NFIA
Hg19::chr1:61548069..61548102,+p3@NFIA
Hg19::chr1:61548118..61548129,+p9@NFIA


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0051322anaphase0.0108906810524625
GO:0000090mitotic anaphase0.0108906810524625
GO:0005876spindle microtubule0.0197881225581302
GO:0019079viral genome replication0.0197881225581302
GO:0000922spindle pole0.0197881225581302
GO:0043025cell soma0.0197881225581302
GO:0006997nuclear organization and biogenesis0.0197881225581302
GO:0030425dendrite0.0197881225581302
GO:0016363nuclear matrix0.0197881225581302
GO:0008017microtubule binding0.0197881225581302
GO:0019058viral infectious cycle0.0197881225581302
GO:0022415viral reproductive process0.0206764560402455
GO:0015631tubulin binding0.0220289584636577
GO:0051321meiotic cell cycle0.0220289584636577
GO:0005819spindle0.0220289584636577
GO:0043005neuron projection0.0220289584636577



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.97e-51114
neural tube2.20e-3156
neural rod2.20e-3156
future spinal cord2.20e-3156
neural keel2.20e-3156
organ system subdivision2.63e-31223
regional part of nervous system1.69e-2953
regional part of brain1.69e-2953
central nervous system2.60e-2981
nervous system3.74e-2989
brain3.49e-2768
future brain3.49e-2768
neurectoderm2.38e-2686
neural plate9.80e-2682
presumptive neural plate9.80e-2682
anatomical cluster1.18e-24373
regional part of forebrain3.83e-2441
forebrain3.83e-2441
anterior neural tube3.83e-2441
future forebrain3.83e-2441
ecto-epithelium4.82e-21104
ectoderm-derived structure5.76e-21171
ectoderm5.76e-21171
presumptive ectoderm5.76e-21171
brain grey matter2.53e-2034
gray matter2.53e-2034
telencephalon3.11e-2034
regional part of telencephalon4.74e-1932
cerebral hemisphere6.66e-1932
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.41e-18132
pre-chordal neural plate7.04e-1861
multi-tissue structure7.20e-18342
anatomical conduit7.64e-17240
cerebral cortex5.28e-1525
pallium5.28e-1525
tube1.58e-14192
regional part of cerebral cortex1.92e-1422
cell layer2.36e-14309
epithelium3.04e-14306
neocortex2.64e-1320
germ layer7.25e-13560
germ layer / neural crest7.25e-13560
embryonic tissue7.25e-13560
presumptive structure7.25e-13560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure7.25e-13560
epiblast (generic)7.25e-13560
embryonic structure2.01e-12564
developing anatomical structure6.26e-12581
multi-cellular organism2.82e-11656
embryo1.17e-10592
anatomical system2.59e-09624
anatomical group4.95e-09625
organ part5.79e-09218
posterior neural tube2.29e-0815
chordal neural plate2.29e-0815
subdivision of digestive tract3.80e-08118
organ1.34e-07503
digestive system1.36e-07145
digestive tract1.36e-07145
primitive gut1.36e-07145
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.91e-0713
endoderm-derived structure6.78e-07160
endoderm6.78e-07160
presumptive endoderm6.78e-07160
neural nucleus8.55e-079
nucleus of brain8.55e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90545.068961261570110.002709998091280770.0148892361857684
CHD2#110648.275218267293490.0004028373567101730.00387652544894994
E2F1#186954.907389214879320.0003512818099256460.00352222743345089
E2F4#1874410.13444825222760.0001818201509632970.00220265801490034
EGR1#195854.988179094810140.0003237398000590710.00330444301977808
EP300#203345.419153380978560.00209386927943890.0121126406156707
FOXA1#3169511.08141974938555.98116883436141e-060.000178731700112123
FOXA2#3170314.77827825159910.0006289192851194480.00517316698579113
HMGN3#932446.542838178680470.00100801277768350.00721858519531591
HNF4G#3174211.50136901057870.01127438304921050.0413704339567315
NR2C2#7182213.04584436209630.00883636412768260.0335439456648387
NR3C1#2908411.97841866493849.4122920812787e-050.00136491304176155
SUZ12#23512220.04631236442520.003824075654154750.0188726319461425
TAF1#687253.343046285745290.002394600090870310.0135161670480681
ZBTB7A#5134157.35190930787594.65425347594289e-050.000815306237460582



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.