Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C677

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:23, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C677_Basophils_CD14_Eosinophils_Neutrophils_CD34_Peripheral_immature



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:81034106..81034115,-p@chr10:81034106..81034115
-
Hg19::chr10:81046025..81046036,-p@chr10:81046025..81046036
-
Hg19::chr10:81046046..81046068,-p@chr10:81046046..81046068
-
Hg19::chr10:81046489..81046500,+p@chr10:81046489..81046500
+
Hg19::chr10:81046514..81046556,+p@chr10:81046514..81046556
+
Hg19::chr10:81046677..81046703,+p@chr10:81046677..81046703
+
Hg19::chr17:78844208..78844221,-p@chr17:78844208..78844221
-
Hg19::chr19:6062269..6062283,-p@chr19:6062269..6062283
-
Hg19::chr19:6062285..6062295,-p@chr19:6062285..6062295
-
Hg19::chr19:6062297..6062310,-p@chr19:6062297..6062310
-
Hg19::chr3:156809021..156809030,-p@chr3:156809021..156809030
-
Hg19::chr6:170862436..170862458,+p@chr6:170862436..170862458
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte3.93e-10542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.93e-10542
defensive cell8.46e-9148
phagocyte8.46e-9148
myeloid leukocyte6.22e-8772
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.38e-8067
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.84e-7661
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.46e-7366
monopoietic cell9.88e-7159
monocyte9.88e-7159
monoblast9.88e-7159
promonocyte9.88e-7159
leukocyte1.22e-67136
myeloid cell2.89e-60108
common myeloid progenitor2.89e-60108
hematopoietic stem cell8.98e-55168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell8.98e-55168
hematopoietic cell2.10e-51177
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell9.42e-50120
nongranular leukocyte2.68e-47115
stuff accumulating cell7.94e-4687
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.29e-44161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.29e-44161
mesenchymal cell7.72e-21354
connective tissue cell3.35e-20361
motile cell5.95e-18386
stem cell3.97e-16441
multi fate stem cell3.36e-15427
somatic stem cell8.07e-15433
intermediate monocyte3.53e-139
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.53e-139
basophil5.13e-123
granulocyte2.87e-118
single nucleate cell1.59e-103
mononuclear cell1.59e-103
natural killer cell2.98e-103
pro-NK cell2.98e-103
blood cell4.37e-0811
CD1a-positive Langerhans cell9.23e-082
immature CD1a-positive Langerhans cell9.23e-082
somatic cell1.42e-07588
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow2.94e-7376
bone element3.34e-6782
hematopoietic system2.05e-6398
blood island2.05e-6398
skeletal element2.26e-6090
immune system4.14e-5893
hemolymphoid system1.35e-56108
skeletal system2.36e-53100
musculoskeletal system6.76e-28167
lateral plate mesoderm1.52e-26203
connective tissue2.49e-19371
mesoderm2.97e-13315
mesoderm-derived structure2.97e-13315
presumptive mesoderm2.97e-13315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BATF#1053848.119267264101210.001077324937599460.00760748743461459
BCL11A#5333549.456485034535690.0006080261876137550.00507485391258635
BCL3#602514.39462616822431.35480146970731e-050.000328368787873665
CHD2#110654.310009514215360.00373109116758340.0185947428159593
EBF1#187953.711027852737090.007149884520589760.0297240183681981
ELF1#199772.483890475971060.009986512778965350.0374566855134624
EP300#203363.38697086311160.004274673782939630.0203103887546714
FOSL1#8061413.23785990545770.0001689953220740490.00206550057836064
GATA2#262444.248310577851330.01122661586864120.0412197762244688
IRF4#366259.131046952810050.0001194522965794710.00162103409595418
MAX#4149105.377129590839273.88944661088221e-071.89198842381894e-05
MEF2A#420546.247743636548020.002834712427412020.0153706729248992
MEF2C#4208413.77045149754130.0001452363397035950.00188684389629354
POU2F2#545253.794218357392720.006499616292676570.0278339111854538
REST#597864.825014358064010.000656447359345280.00537420285040854
RXRA#625646.691539046377760.002204954724098080.0127031810696204
SPI1#668864.102161754261360.001568896548030080.00994923714735037
TCF12#693865.317232451093210.0003865425927634440.00378209873015002
ZBTB33#10009513.19363542915882.06208457123933e-050.000456082275594376



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.