Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3418

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:02, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr3:84109307..84109378,-p7@Trim2
Mm9::chr6:137200798..137200815,+p4@Ptpro
Mm9::chr6:137200859..137200875,+p8@Ptpro


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0007185transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase signaling pathway0.0350627294143428



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system4.03e-3173
nervous system4.66e-3175
ectoderm-derived structure1.41e-2895
ectoderm1.41e-2895
presumptive ectoderm1.41e-2895
neurectoderm6.91e-2864
neural plate6.91e-2864
presumptive neural plate6.91e-2864
regional part of nervous system1.61e-2654
pre-chordal neural plate2.42e-2549
neural tube1.31e-2452
neural rod1.31e-2452
future spinal cord1.31e-2452
neural keel1.31e-2452
ecto-epithelium1.38e-2373
anterior neural tube2.53e-2240
regional part of forebrain1.33e-2139
forebrain1.33e-2139
future forebrain1.33e-2139
brain1.78e-2147
future brain1.78e-2147
gray matter1.02e-2034
regional part of brain1.32e-2046
brain grey matter3.76e-1729
regional part of telencephalon3.76e-1729
telencephalon3.76e-1729
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.11e-1592
cerebral cortex4.79e-1121
cerebral hemisphere4.79e-1121
pallium4.79e-1121
regional part of cerebral cortex4.49e-0817
basal ganglion1.51e-078
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.51e-078
aggregate regional part of brain1.51e-078
collection of basal ganglia1.51e-078
cerebral subcortex1.51e-078


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}