Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2451

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:29, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr6:85401977..85401997,+p2@Cct7
Mm9::chr6:85401999..85402020,+p3@Cct7
Mm9::chr8:86239204..86239211,+p5@Ddx39
Mm9::chr9:46081231..46081284,+p1@Zfp259


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
connective tissue cell1.23e-1046
mesenchymal cell1.23e-1046
motile cell1.38e-1054
hematopoietic cell4.16e-1032
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.16e-1032
hematopoietic stem cell4.16e-1032
angioblastic mesenchymal cell4.16e-1032
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.16e-1032
stem cell1.28e-0997
somatic cell7.84e-08118
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.17e-0712
nucleate cell1.28e-0716
lymphocyte1.57e-0713
common lymphoid progenitor1.57e-0713
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.45e-0725
somatic stem cell3.62e-0791
multi fate stem cell3.62e-0791
animal cell4.16e-07115
eukaryotic cell4.16e-07115
T cell4.40e-0711
pro-T cell4.40e-0711
mature alpha-beta T cell7.23e-079
alpha-beta T cell7.23e-079
immature T cell7.23e-079
mature T cell7.23e-079
immature alpha-beta T cell7.23e-079

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
connective tissue1.23e-1046
hemolymphoid system2.88e-0848
immune system2.88e-0848
hematopoietic system4.41e-0845
blood island4.41e-0845
unilaminar epithelium1.43e-0766
gut epithelium2.34e-0755
segment of respiratory tract5.07e-0727


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}