Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1325

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:42, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr12:5382494..5382511,-p1@Klhl29
Mm9::chr2:6793300..6793328,-p@chr2:6793300..6793328
-
Mm9::chr2:6793553..6793580,-p15@Celf2
Mm9::chr2:6793581..6793625,-p7@Celf2
Mm9::chr2:6793634..6793661,-p8@Celf2
Mm9::chr2:6793665..6793749,-p3@Celf2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
ectoderm-derived structure1.73e-3395
ectoderm1.73e-3395
presumptive ectoderm1.73e-3395
nervous system6.80e-3075
central nervous system8.43e-3073
ecto-epithelium2.54e-2673
neurectoderm8.72e-2664
neural plate8.72e-2664
presumptive neural plate8.72e-2664
regional part of nervous system1.84e-2154
pre-chordal neural plate2.55e-2149
neural tube2.75e-2052
neural rod2.75e-2052
future spinal cord2.75e-2052
neural keel2.75e-2052
brain3.21e-2047
future brain3.21e-2047
regional part of brain1.67e-1946
anterior neural tube3.95e-1840
regional part of forebrain1.15e-1739
forebrain1.15e-1739
future forebrain1.15e-1739
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.03e-1792
gray matter6.32e-1734
brain grey matter1.57e-1629
regional part of telencephalon1.57e-1629
telencephalon1.57e-1629
cerebral cortex6.64e-1321
cerebral hemisphere6.64e-1321
pallium6.64e-1321
multi-cellular organism1.14e-11333
regional part of cerebral cortex3.31e-1017
embryo6.50e-07320
autonomic nervous system7.90e-079


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}