Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3667

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:18, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3667_Natural_CD8_CD4_Basophils_Peripheral_CD14_adipose



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:65373583..65373610,+p3@PITPNC1
Hg19::chr17:65374075..65374129,+p4@PITPNC1
Hg19::chr17:65374895..65374909,-p@chr17:65374895..65374909
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.27e-27136
nongranular leukocyte6.29e-26115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.08e-22120
classical monocyte1.40e-2142
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.40e-2142
defensive cell4.66e-2048
phagocyte4.66e-2048
hematopoietic stem cell2.91e-18168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.91e-18168
myeloid leukocyte7.49e-1872
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.02e-17161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.02e-17161
hematopoietic cell7.79e-16177
monopoietic cell7.85e-1559
monocyte7.85e-1559
monoblast7.85e-1559
promonocyte7.85e-1559
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.25e-1467
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.76e-1461
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.18e-1366
mature alpha-beta T cell1.15e-1218
alpha-beta T cell1.15e-1218
immature T cell1.15e-1218
mature T cell1.15e-1218
immature alpha-beta T cell1.15e-1218
T cell7.63e-1125
pro-T cell7.63e-1125
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.41e-1052
lymphocyte7.08e-1053
common lymphoid progenitor7.08e-1053
nucleate cell9.54e-0955
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.23e-0811
myeloid cell1.60e-08108
common myeloid progenitor1.60e-08108
stuff accumulating cell1.92e-0787
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system4.64e-1998
blood island4.64e-1998
hemolymphoid system6.36e-19108
adult organism1.19e-18114
immune system2.88e-1493
bone marrow6.85e-1276
bone element1.45e-1082
skeletal system5.44e-09100
skeletal element9.44e-0990
lateral plate mesoderm1.77e-08203


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0279202492732329
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324969420667967
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109314840901893



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.