Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2938

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:36, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2938_CD4_Peripheral_CD8_Natural_acute_chronic_Renal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:134152345..134152369,-p1@FAM78A
Hg19::chr9:134152371..134152402,-p2@FAM78A
Hg19::chr9:134152417..134152430,-p6@FAM78A
Hg19::chr9:134152434..134152466,-p@chr9:134152434..134152466
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell3.23e-65168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.23e-65168
hematopoietic cell3.13e-64177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.13e-61161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.13e-61161
nongranular leukocyte3.86e-50115
leukocyte3.33e-45136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.98e-43120
myeloid cell1.61e-36108
common myeloid progenitor1.61e-36108
monopoietic cell1.48e-2459
monocyte1.48e-2459
monoblast1.48e-2459
promonocyte1.48e-2459
myeloid leukocyte5.05e-2372
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.41e-2361
nucleate cell1.69e-2255
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.00e-2266
lymphocyte7.10e-2253
common lymphoid progenitor7.10e-2253
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.45e-2152
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.16e-2067
defensive cell1.21e-1848
phagocyte1.21e-1848
classical monocyte3.73e-1642
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.73e-1642
T cell3.78e-1625
pro-T cell3.78e-1625
mature alpha-beta T cell2.36e-1418
alpha-beta T cell2.36e-1418
immature T cell2.36e-1418
mature T cell2.36e-1418
immature alpha-beta T cell2.36e-1418
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.83e-0911
mesenchymal cell4.15e-08354
connective tissue cell1.14e-07361
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system7.82e-2798
blood island7.82e-2798
hemolymphoid system5.23e-24108
bone marrow1.89e-1676
immune system2.43e-1693
adult organism1.37e-15114
bone element3.26e-1482
skeletal element3.76e-1190
lateral plate mesoderm2.69e-10203
blood3.09e-1015
haemolymphatic fluid3.09e-1015
organism substance3.09e-1015
skeletal system3.34e-08100
connective tissue9.65e-07371
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
leukemia4.42e-2039
myeloid leukemia9.05e-1931
hematologic cancer9.57e-1851
immune system cancer9.57e-1851


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EGR1#195844.988179094810140.001615011500076050.0101688181139714



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.