Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1809

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:43, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1809_CD4_Peripheral_normal_Neutrophils_CD8_Natural_CD14



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:12902603..12902655,-p@chr19:12902603..12902655
-
Hg19::chr19:12902681..12902688,-p@chr19:12902681..12902688
-
Hg19::chr19:12903127..12903178,-p1@CU678639
p1@CU679368
Hg19::chr19:12903214..12903252,-p3@CU678639
p3@CU679368
Hg19::chr19:12903367..12903458,-p2@CU678639
p2@CU679368


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte7.90e-24136
myeloid leukocyte4.29e-2372
defensive cell1.32e-2048
phagocyte1.32e-2048
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.13e-1961
nongranular leukocyte3.22e-19115
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell9.77e-1967
classical monocyte1.17e-1842
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.17e-1842
monopoietic cell1.18e-1859
monocyte1.18e-1859
monoblast1.18e-1859
promonocyte1.18e-1859
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.20e-18120
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.08e-1866
hematopoietic stem cell2.77e-15168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.77e-15168
hematopoietic cell6.94e-15177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.40e-13161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.40e-13161
myeloid cell1.33e-11108
common myeloid progenitor1.33e-11108
stuff accumulating cell4.47e-1087
intermediate monocyte9.45e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte9.45e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system9.81e-2498
blood island9.81e-2498
hemolymphoid system3.84e-21108
bone marrow2.51e-1776
skeletal element9.65e-1690
bone element1.12e-1582
immune system4.23e-1593
skeletal system6.52e-14100
blood5.27e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid5.27e-0815
organism substance5.27e-0815
lateral plate mesoderm3.15e-07203


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ETS1#211359.728760922202341.14685159850452e-050.000292207938756315
GABPB1#255357.067683836182175.6685482528729e-050.000948290102485652
MAX#414945.16204440720570.002526309009485180.0139985773897295
NANOG#79923317.54686708860760.0003794200090681830.00376139025411219
NR2C2#7182319.56876654314450.0002750171700966610.00293146746557717
TAF7#687936.859841642954350.005843286407019040.0262469136408181
TCF12#693836.380678941311850.007185168653258840.0298315177490638
TCF7L2#693436.462105937882410.006930108755689190.0293227577010664
USF1#739145.089199421766370.00266867775360040.0147195160236743
USF2#7392410.39375790805570.0001646179728687530.00202646587322486



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.