Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1771

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:40, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1771_CD14_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_Peripheral_Whole_CD14CD16_blood



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:8727024..8727043,+p@chr16:8727024..8727043
+
Hg19::chr1:150583889..150583898,-p@chr1:150583889..150583898
-
Hg19::chr20:46369846..46369868,+p@chr20:46369846..46369868
+
Hg19::chr22:30666830..30666847,-p@chr22:30666830..30666847
-
Hg19::chr2:219235586..219235598,+p@chr2:219235586..219235598
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte2.25e-13342
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.25e-13342
defensive cell1.84e-11548
phagocyte1.84e-11548
myeloid leukocyte4.04e-9872
monopoietic cell2.21e-9059
monocyte2.21e-9059
monoblast2.21e-9059
promonocyte2.21e-9059
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.81e-8761
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.71e-8066
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.41e-7867
leukocyte3.51e-62136
myeloid cell3.58e-62108
common myeloid progenitor3.58e-62108
stuff accumulating cell3.05e-5987
nongranular leukocyte4.07e-57115
hematopoietic stem cell2.81e-48168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.81e-48168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.84e-46120
hematopoietic cell2.89e-45177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.35e-44161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.35e-44161
intermediate monocyte1.17e-299
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.17e-299
mesenchymal cell5.27e-17354
connective tissue cell1.88e-16361
granulocyte5.09e-168
motile cell1.65e-14386
multi fate stem cell3.93e-12427
somatic stem cell8.35e-12433
single nucleate cell1.08e-113
mononuclear cell1.08e-113
blood cell1.86e-1111
stem cell2.22e-11441
basophil6.07e-113
non-classical monocyte2.22e-103
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte2.22e-103
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.08e-7598
blood island1.08e-7598
bone marrow3.14e-6876
hemolymphoid system9.55e-68108
bone element1.41e-6282
skeletal element3.37e-5690
immune system4.35e-5493
skeletal system1.20e-49100
lateral plate mesoderm4.37e-31203
musculoskeletal system6.91e-26167
mesoderm3.71e-16315
mesoderm-derived structure3.71e-16315
presumptive mesoderm3.71e-16315
connective tissue1.06e-15371
blood1.22e-1315
haemolymphatic fluid1.22e-1315
organism substance1.22e-1315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
MAFF#23764222.52614259597810.003041818451272880.0160479125698367



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.