Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C916

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:42, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C916_Natural_CD8_CD14_Basophils_Whole_Peripheral_CD4



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:10017864..10017880,-p16@GAS7
Hg19::chr17:10017891..10017924,-p9@GAS7
Hg19::chr17:10018796..10018825,+p@chr17:10018796..10018825
+
Hg19::chr1:25228796..25228804,-p@chr1:25228796..25228804
-
Hg19::chr1:25245820..25245840,-p@chr1:25245820..25245840
-
Hg19::chr1:25248726..25248732,-p@chr1:25248726..25248732
-
Hg19::chr1:25249270..25249275,-p@chr1:25249270..25249275
-
Hg19::chr1:25254150..25254174,-p2@EF491807
Hg19::chr1:25254177..25254220,-p1@EF491807


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0045786negative regulation of progression through cell cycle0.00278412055790254
GO:0000074regulation of progression through cell cycle0.00278412055790254
GO:0051726regulation of cell cycle0.00278412055790254
GO:0022402cell cycle process0.00633631022849388
GO:0007049cell cycle0.00882937210526807
GO:0050680negative regulation of epithelial cell proliferation0.00882937210526807
GO:0048523negative regulation of cellular process0.0113398994525439
GO:0048519negative regulation of biological process0.0113398994525439
GO:0050678regulation of epithelial cell proliferation0.0132663844202363
GO:0050673epithelial cell proliferation0.0132663844202363
GO:0003700transcription factor activity0.0132663844202363
GO:0048869cellular developmental process0.0163683765033966
GO:0030154cell differentiation0.0163683765033966
GO:0007050cell cycle arrest0.0318070797147764
GO:0032502developmental process0.0485201580171879
GO:0003677DNA binding0.0499127809821499



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.47e-54140
hematopoietic stem cell3.59e-48172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.59e-48172
hematopoietic cell8.29e-48182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.51e-45165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.51e-45165
nongranular leukocyte1.57e-43119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.85e-42124
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte6.86e-2742
myeloid leukocyte3.24e-2576
classical monocyte5.00e-2345
myeloid cell2.59e-22112
common myeloid progenitor2.59e-22112
lymphocyte9.21e-2253
common lymphoid progenitor9.21e-2253
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.45e-2152
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell7.60e-2171
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.05e-2065
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.53e-1970
monopoietic cell3.89e-1963
monocyte3.89e-1963
monoblast3.89e-1963
promonocyte3.89e-1963
mesenchymal cell2.78e-17358
connective tissue cell6.98e-17365
motile cell7.35e-15390
T cell1.25e-1125
pro-T cell1.25e-1125
mature alpha-beta T cell2.99e-1118
alpha-beta T cell2.99e-1118
immature T cell2.99e-1118
mature T cell2.99e-1118
immature alpha-beta T cell2.99e-1118
lymphocyte of B lineage3.26e-0924
pro-B cell3.26e-0924
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell6.57e-0811
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system7.14e-27102
blood island7.14e-27102
hemolymphoid system9.98e-23112
bone marrow2.72e-1780
bone element2.83e-1786
connective tissue4.57e-16375
skeletal element8.47e-14101
skeletal system8.47e-14101
immune system1.12e-10115
blood5.78e-0915
haemolymphatic fluid5.78e-0915
organism substance5.78e-0915


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.