Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C905

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:41, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C905_cerebellum_occipital_anaplastic_middle_parietal_Neutrophils_olfactory



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:73569774..73569903,+p@chr14:73569774..73569903
+
Hg19::chr6:99848922..99848992,-p2@PNISR
Hg19::chr6:99848993..99849028,-p9@PNISR
Hg19::chr6:99849060..99849082,-p8@PNISR
Hg19::chr6:99849107..99849160,-p3@PNISR
Hg19::chr6:99849197..99849216,-p7@PNISR
Hg19::chr6:99849280..99849318,-p5@PNISR
Hg19::chr6:99849347..99849412,-p4@PNISR
Hg19::chr6:99850561..99850620,-p6@PNISR


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube9.31e-1257
neural rod9.31e-1257
future spinal cord9.31e-1257
neural keel9.31e-1257
regional part of forebrain8.12e-1141
forebrain8.12e-1141
future forebrain8.12e-1141
anterior neural tube2.93e-1042
gray matter1.34e-0934
brain grey matter1.34e-0934
central nervous system7.52e-0982
brain3.10e-0869
future brain3.10e-0869
regional part of nervous system3.66e-0894
nervous system3.66e-0894
regional part of telencephalon3.73e-0833
regional part of brain4.01e-0859
telencephalon6.95e-0834
adult organism8.35e-08115
cerebral hemisphere8.76e-0832
neurectoderm4.43e-0790
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer2.69e-18235
disease of cellular proliferation2.01e-17239
organ system cancer3.60e-10137
hematologic cancer9.52e-1051
immune system cancer9.52e-1051
leukemia3.35e-0839
cell type cancer5.08e-08143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.