Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C873

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:38, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C873_Cardiac_Synoviocyte_Fibroblast_tridermal_mesenchymal_tenocyte_liposarcoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:44873195..44873209,-p@chr10:44873195..44873209
-
Hg19::chr10:44873395..44873433,-p@chr10:44873395..44873433
-
Hg19::chr10:44873515..44873537,-p@chr10:44873515..44873537
-
Hg19::chr10:44873654..44873664,-p@chr10:44873654..44873664
-
Hg19::chr10:44873833..44873848,-p@chr10:44873833..44873848
-
Hg19::chr10:44873981..44873998,-p@chr10:44873981..44873998
-
Hg19::chr10:44874028..44874042,+p@chr10:44874028..44874042
+
Hg19::chr10:44874154..44874172,-p@chr10:44874154..44874172
-
Hg19::chr10:44880536..44880553,-p1@CXCL12


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision2.48e-14365
multi-cellular organism4.32e-14659
adult organism1.84e-13115
anatomical cluster2.90e-12286
muscle tissue3.68e-1263
musculature3.68e-1263
musculature of body3.68e-1263
somite9.55e-1283
paraxial mesoderm9.55e-1283
presomitic mesoderm9.55e-1283
presumptive segmental plate9.55e-1283
trunk paraxial mesoderm9.55e-1283
presumptive paraxial mesoderm9.55e-1283
skeletal muscle tissue1.58e-1161
striated muscle tissue1.58e-1161
myotome1.58e-1161
multi-tissue structure2.27e-11347
dermomyotome3.42e-1170
primary circulatory organ1.68e-1027
anatomical conduit2.45e-10241
trunk mesenchyme6.32e-10143
heart1.16e-0924
primitive heart tube1.16e-0924
primary heart field1.16e-0924
anterior lateral plate mesoderm1.16e-0924
heart tube1.16e-0924
heart primordium1.16e-0924
cardiac mesoderm1.16e-0924
cardiogenic plate1.16e-0924
heart rudiment1.16e-0924
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.21e-0984
cell layer9.65e-09312
anatomical system9.97e-09625
epithelium1.30e-08309
anatomical group1.59e-08626
multilaminar epithelium1.66e-0882
tube1.75e-08194
circulatory system7.80e-08113
epithelial tube9.36e-08118
vasculature2.21e-0779
vascular system2.21e-0779
cardiovascular system3.29e-07110


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.