Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2815

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:36, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2815_Monocytederived_CD14_Mast_corpus_Macrophage_Dendritic_optic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:150632645..150632658,+p5@GM2A
Hg19::chr5:150632666..150632677,+p6@GM2A
Hg19::chr5:150632678..150632707,+p3@GM2A
Hg19::chr5:150632712..150632725,+p4@GM2A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organ3.00e-15511
neural tube2.04e-1457
neural rod2.04e-1457
future spinal cord2.04e-1457
neural keel2.04e-1457
adult organism5.41e-14115
anatomical group2.47e-13626
neural plate2.95e-1386
presumptive neural plate2.95e-1386
anatomical system4.07e-13625
regional part of brain9.62e-1359
multi-cellular organism1.73e-12659
neurectoderm3.97e-1190
central nervous system5.24e-1182
brain8.36e-1169
future brain8.36e-1169
head8.77e-11123
regional part of forebrain1.65e-1041
forebrain1.65e-1041
future forebrain1.65e-1041
ectoderm-derived structure2.82e-10169
anterior neural tube7.67e-1042
embryonic structure1.52e-09605
developing anatomical structure1.52e-09605
germ layer1.57e-09604
embryonic tissue1.57e-09604
presumptive structure1.57e-09604
epiblast (generic)1.57e-09604
telencephalon1.60e-0934
anterior region of body1.83e-09129
craniocervical region1.83e-09129
gray matter2.10e-0934
brain grey matter2.10e-0934
embryo2.41e-09612
regional part of nervous system2.87e-0994
nervous system2.87e-0994
bone marrow4.50e-0980
regional part of telencephalon4.56e-0933
ectoderm5.28e-09173
presumptive ectoderm5.28e-09173
pre-chordal neural plate7.68e-0961
bone element1.52e-0886
cerebral hemisphere1.79e-0832
skeletal element7.56e-08101
skeletal system7.56e-08101
immune system2.78e-07115


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90546.336201576962630.0006203100587215640.00513267011747912
CEBPB#105147.971147625824820.0002476385788090830.00268512515907826
CHD2#1106410.34402283411698.73193255208051e-050.00129300199036826
E2F6#187645.017155731697390.00157802193473060.00998648929536017
EGR1#195844.988179094810140.001615011500076050.0101614667182627
ELF1#199744.258097958807540.003041525565781240.0161212895130241
FOS#235348.99795530889440.0001525147711168630.00195321768003361
GABPB1#255347.067683836182170.0004006876864423170.00390768711218126
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.0186498743755422
HNF4G#3174214.37671126322340.006924169980439180.0293106918201641
IRF1#365947.63716375356390.0002938853996185490.00308009004021692
MAX#414946.452555509007120.0005767613195645490.00486130057735469
MXI1#460149.96157162875930.0001015224754950450.00142665578824367
MYC#460945.22228187160940.001344309395272740.00889328744744976
NFYA#4800418.42558069983058.67100748407158e-060.00023503538817258
NFYB#4801416.75979325353651.26678572070404e-050.00031181200538442
PAX5#507946.669565531177830.0005052774169483260.00444759107869079
POU2F2#545249.106124057742520.000145395665174930.00188656701145539
RFX5#5993412.04791082719514.74457429336527e-050.00082793415977406
RXRA#6256315.055962854350.0004758307997303580.00433982122897903
SIN3A#2594245.408884726815140.001168172384885160.00797716462044075
SP1#666745.69838137814090.0009482606065333980.00685460890682043
SP2#6668426.15353049384462.13562021071447e-067.7606833398333e-05
SPI1#668848.204323508522730.000220661881527680.00249763804539605
STAT3#6774410.51946499715428.16377768286615e-050.00123388824518214
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0323081895110129
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244875117357237
TCF7L2#6934410.77017656313737.42969445082454e-050.00115675292002037
THAP1#55145431.36914460285131.03171810326891e-064.32390076193025e-05
USF1#739146.361499277207960.0006105011399140830.00508778555310301
ZBTB7A#5134147.35190930787590.000342223540015990.00347173232595726
ZEB1#6935416.88843201754391.22862303393937e-050.0003050063252712



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.