Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4095

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:49, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4095_CD14CD16_B_Eosinophils_CD14_Basophils_Neutrophils_CD19



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr22:35806354..35806377,+p4@MCM5
Hg19::chrX:12994220..12994275,+p4@TMSB4X
Hg19::chrX:12994281..12994313,+p2@TMSB4X


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell1.36e-57172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.36e-57172
leukocyte3.63e-56140
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.73e-54165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.73e-54165
hematopoietic cell1.24e-53182
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.05e-46124
nongranular leukocyte1.46e-45119
myeloid cell1.64e-36112
common myeloid progenitor1.64e-36112
myeloid leukocyte5.25e-3576
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.15e-3171
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.13e-2970
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.98e-2965
monopoietic cell3.95e-2863
monocyte3.95e-2863
monoblast3.95e-2863
promonocyte3.95e-2863
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.41e-2642
classical monocyte1.20e-2345
mesenchymal cell1.89e-22358
connective tissue cell1.54e-21365
multi fate stem cell4.39e-18430
stem cell5.59e-17444
somatic stem cell4.37e-16436
motile cell1.65e-15390
lymphocyte2.37e-1553
common lymphoid progenitor2.37e-1553
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.96e-1552
lymphocyte of B lineage3.01e-1124
pro-B cell3.01e-1124
B cell2.52e-0814
intermediate monocyte3.42e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.42e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system2.98e-37112
hematopoietic system4.41e-37102
blood island4.41e-37102
bone marrow3.34e-2980
bone element6.30e-2486
immune system2.08e-23115
connective tissue4.63e-20375
skeletal element1.13e-18101
skeletal system1.13e-18101
lateral plate mesoderm2.61e-12216
musculoskeletal system5.85e-09167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0463244147160371
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0109215976729147



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.