Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3142

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:05, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3142_Smooth_mesenchymal_small_Sertoli_Lens_Fibroblast_anaplastic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:32112568..32112575,+p7@RCN1
Hg19::chr11:32112576..32112600,+p3@RCN1
Hg19::chr11:32112612..32112660,+p1@RCN1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vasculature1.04e-2079
vascular system1.04e-2079
somite5.90e-1983
paraxial mesoderm5.90e-1983
presomitic mesoderm5.90e-1983
presumptive segmental plate5.90e-1983
trunk paraxial mesoderm5.90e-1983
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.90e-1983
dermomyotome4.96e-1870
multilaminar epithelium8.14e-1782
trunk mesenchyme1.61e-16143
skeletal muscle tissue3.79e-1661
striated muscle tissue3.79e-1661
myotome3.79e-1661
unilaminar epithelium4.04e-16138
vessel7.93e-1669
muscle tissue4.15e-1563
musculature4.15e-1563
musculature of body4.15e-1563
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.46e-1484
cardiovascular system1.93e-13110
trunk1.94e-13216
blood vessel2.36e-1360
epithelial tube open at both ends2.36e-1360
blood vasculature2.36e-1360
vascular cord2.36e-1360
epithelial tube1.02e-12118
circulatory system1.62e-12113
artery3.19e-1142
arterial blood vessel3.19e-1142
arterial system3.19e-1142
cell layer1.12e-10312
epithelium1.79e-10309
organism subdivision1.81e-10365
mesenchyme2.38e-10238
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.38e-10238
multi-tissue structure1.69e-09347
systemic artery2.20e-0933
systemic arterial system2.20e-0933
multi-cellular organism3.04e-09659
anatomical cluster1.20e-07286
surface structure3.05e-0795
aorta3.41e-0721
aortic system3.41e-0721
anatomical system6.80e-07625
anatomical group7.71e-07626
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer3.74e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.032370754219369
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00540676248558725
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00247382785640064



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.