Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2743

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:27, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2743_immature_migratory_cord_CD19_CD14_Dendritic_Natural



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:5229456..5229471,+p7@EDEM1
Hg19::chr3:5229484..5229499,+p4@EDEM1
Hg19::chr3:71114592..71114612,-p@chr3:71114592..71114612
-
Hg19::chr9:5438330..5438382,-p3@C9orf46


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0030433ER-associated protein catabolic process0.018538133087335
GO:0006515misfolded or incompletely synthesized protein catabolic process0.018538133087335
GO:0004571mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase activity0.018538133087335
GO:0043161proteasomal ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process0.018538133087335
GO:0015924mannosyl-oligosaccharide mannosidase activity0.018538133087335
GO:0015923mannosidase activity0.0216246375331606
GO:0030176integral to endoplasmic reticulum membrane0.0226045344575232
GO:0051789response to protein stimulus0.0226045344575232
GO:0006986response to unfolded protein0.0226045344575232
GO:0031227intrinsic to endoplasmic reticulum membrane0.0226045344575232
GO:0031301integral to organelle membrane0.0467722791504351
GO:0031300intrinsic to organelle membrane0.0468754537772942



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte5.69e-46140
hematopoietic stem cell2.02e-37172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.02e-37172
hematopoietic cell9.65e-37182
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.86e-34124
nongranular leukocyte6.79e-34119
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell9.09e-34165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell9.09e-34165
myeloid leukocyte2.89e-2576
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.74e-2371
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.99e-2242
mesenchymal cell1.40e-20358
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.35e-2065
myeloid cell9.19e-20112
common myeloid progenitor9.19e-20112
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.05e-1970
classical monocyte3.50e-1945
monopoietic cell4.20e-1963
monocyte4.20e-1963
monoblast4.20e-1963
promonocyte4.20e-1963
connective tissue cell4.68e-19365
motile cell3.75e-16390
multi fate stem cell1.05e-15430
somatic stem cell2.00e-15436
stem cell6.36e-15444
somatic cell8.68e-15591
lymphocyte4.41e-1353
common lymphoid progenitor4.41e-1353
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.17e-1252
lymphocyte of B lineage1.94e-0924
pro-B cell1.94e-0924
animal cell2.96e-09679
eukaryotic cell2.96e-09679
native cell6.28e-09722
dendritic cell2.03e-0810
conventional dendritic cell3.19e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system6.03e-21102
blood island6.03e-21102
hemolymphoid system5.65e-20112
bone marrow1.43e-1980
bone element3.76e-1886
connective tissue4.00e-18375
immune system1.63e-17115
skeletal element3.02e-15101
skeletal system3.02e-15101
lateral plate mesoderm5.06e-09216
musculoskeletal system6.52e-07167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.