Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3551

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:28, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3551_acute_Mast_biphenotypic_leukemia_embryonic_small_CD14



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:28995993..28996015,-p1@CU678918
Hg19::chr16:28996019..28996030,-p3@CU678918
Hg19::chr16:28996032..28996043,-p4@CU678918


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell4.86e-38168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell4.86e-38168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.41e-37161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.41e-37161
hematopoietic cell2.71e-35177
myeloid cell4.67e-34108
common myeloid progenitor4.67e-34108
leukocyte1.18e-28136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell8.04e-28120
myeloid leukocyte1.72e-2772
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.50e-2766
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.87e-2667
nongranular leukocyte1.09e-22115
defensive cell5.22e-2048
phagocyte5.22e-2048
monopoietic cell5.23e-2059
monocyte5.23e-2059
monoblast5.23e-2059
promonocyte5.23e-2059
classical monocyte1.63e-1942
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.63e-1942
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.00e-1961
histamine secreting cell5.71e-145
biogenic amine secreting cell5.71e-145
granulocytopoietic cell5.71e-145
mast cell5.71e-145
mast cell progenitor5.71e-145
basophil mast progenitor cell5.71e-145
mesenchymal cell3.58e-11354
connective tissue cell1.16e-10361
T cell3.63e-1025
pro-T cell3.63e-1025
motile cell5.80e-10386
stuff accumulating cell2.46e-0887
endocrine cell1.68e-079
mature alpha-beta T cell8.65e-0718
alpha-beta T cell8.65e-0718
immature T cell8.65e-0718
mature T cell8.65e-0718
immature alpha-beta T cell8.65e-0718
multi fate stem cell9.31e-07427
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.57e-2698
blood island1.57e-2698
hemolymphoid system4.44e-23108
bone marrow3.87e-2276
immune system6.15e-2293
bone element6.80e-2082
skeletal element2.26e-1790
skeletal system8.40e-15100
connective tissue1.51e-10371
thymus6.12e-094
hemolymphoid system gland6.12e-094
thymic region6.12e-094
pharyngeal gland6.12e-094
thymus primordium6.12e-094
lateral plate mesoderm3.18e-08203
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
leukemia3.96e-1839
hematologic cancer1.06e-1551
immune system cancer1.06e-1551
myeloid leukemia4.71e-1531


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.401049
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.758317
MA0017.11.64148
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.11.36698
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.11.55947
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.12.32521
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.11.3784
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.12.29531
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.15.33893
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.757898
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.23.88385
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.11.51687
MA0155.12.83144
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.455568
MA0163.11.84145
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.22.08754
MA0079.23.14419
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.11.29138
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.