Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C704

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:25, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C704_Eosinophils_CD14CD16_Neutrophils_CD14_CD4_Basophils_Peripheral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:2303458..2303472,+p@chr17:2303458..2303472
+
Hg19::chr17:2303504..2303517,+p@chr17:2303504..2303517
+
Hg19::chr17:2303522..2303540,+p@chr17:2303522..2303540
+
Hg19::chr19:12893132..12893144,-p@chr19:12893132..12893144
-
Hg19::chr19:12893177..12893196,-p@chr19:12893177..12893196
-
Hg19::chr1:12234102..12234139,+p@chr1:12234102..12234139
+
Hg19::chr1:244211415..244211427,-p@chr1:244211415..244211427
-
Hg19::chr2:220041798..220041847,+p@chr2:220041798..220041847
+
Hg19::chr5:1386102..1386116,+p@chr5:1386102..1386116
+
Hg19::chr5:98265529..98265551,+p@chr5:98265529..98265551
+
Hg19::chr5:98265553..98265578,+p@chr5:98265553..98265578
+
Hg19::chr6:170862932..170862947,+p5@TBP


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.03e-69136
classical monocyte2.32e-5642
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.32e-5642
nongranular leukocyte9.49e-53115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.30e-52120
hematopoietic stem cell3.09e-52168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.09e-52168
myeloid leukocyte2.03e-4972
hematopoietic cell3.52e-48177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.02e-47161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.02e-47161
defensive cell2.01e-4748
phagocyte2.01e-4748
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell5.69e-4067
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.35e-3961
monopoietic cell7.72e-3759
monocyte7.72e-3759
monoblast7.72e-3759
promonocyte7.72e-3759
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.08e-3666
myeloid cell2.15e-32108
common myeloid progenitor2.15e-32108
stuff accumulating cell8.25e-2087
mature alpha-beta T cell2.50e-1618
alpha-beta T cell2.50e-1618
immature T cell2.50e-1618
mature T cell2.50e-1618
immature alpha-beta T cell2.50e-1618
intermediate monocyte2.82e-159
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte2.82e-159
mesenchymal cell2.39e-14354
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.28e-1452
connective tissue cell1.40e-13361
granulocyte1.48e-138
lymphocyte2.14e-1353
common lymphoid progenitor2.14e-1353
nucleate cell1.28e-1255
T cell7.15e-1225
pro-T cell7.15e-1225
motile cell2.24e-11386
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.46e-106
blood cell2.72e-0911
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell3.33e-0911
multi fate stem cell8.13e-08427
stem cell1.26e-07441
somatic stem cell2.11e-07433
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.66e-4598
blood island1.66e-4598
hemolymphoid system2.03e-39108
bone marrow1.87e-3676
immune system1.46e-3393
bone element1.31e-3282
skeletal element2.68e-2890
skeletal system6.59e-24100
lateral plate mesoderm1.00e-14203
connective tissue1.52e-12371
musculoskeletal system1.08e-08167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90584.224134384641760.0001042269793544080.00145370746484976
CEBPB#105163.985573812912410.001827907733545880.0108247253222839
CHD2#110665.172011417058430.0004497895363246330.00418416045107405
CTCF#1066462.680128186537510.01385375074811150.0487293504776375
E2F1#186983.271592809919550.000663878513766830.00542738223869229
E2F6#187693.762866798773046.04050132232551e-050.000991768460308683
EBF1#187985.937644564379348.2084546063492e-060.00022703463734971
EGR1#195893.74113432110766.33970241327135e-050.00103406556354778
ELF1#199772.483890475971060.009986512778965350.0374580307471039
HEY1#2346272.356731441811660.01346982061264720.0475808223961394
HMGN3#932485.452365148900391.56099565068508e-050.000365781522912046
MYC#460993.916711403707054.32027414396341e-050.000770368979548223
NR3C1#290867.486511665586525.75824923499379e-050.000960066717518386
PAX5#507963.334782765588910.004629821511058920.0218625459507837
PBX3#5090610.95725634337216.55956664029628e-060.000193305468494894
POLR2A#5430101.789544313798390.01056859658770230.0390536623508842
PRDM1#639221.97182596291010.003608092359441310.0182632461555611
SIN3A#2594262.704442363407570.01325491342780750.0468882910000943
SMARCC1#6599310.91583982990790.002261599214152550.0128424945806263
SPI1#668864.102161754261360.001568896548030080.00995044553225926
TAF1#687282.228697523830190.009307457816451660.0351584775351705
TBP#690892.780078015322290.000724921312220490.00578292521593307
ZBTB7A#5134174.288613762927610.0003629129921758860.00362458353159198
ZEB1#693545.629477339181290.0041376490332310.0197194454404314



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.