Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2410

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:29, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2410_medial_amygdala_brain_smallcell_putamen_cerebellum_parietal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:42390503..42390533,+p@chr17:42390503..42390533
+
Hg19::chr19:55686309..55686319,-p@chr19:55686309..55686319
-
Hg19::chr1:110738238..110738245,+p5@SLC6A17
Hg19::chr1:110740082..110740093,+p@chr1:110740082..110740093
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system7.03e-7953
regional part of brain7.03e-7953
neural tube2.18e-7856
neural rod2.18e-7856
future spinal cord2.18e-7856
neural keel2.18e-7856
regional part of forebrain5.65e-6941
forebrain5.65e-6941
anterior neural tube5.65e-6941
future forebrain5.65e-6941
central nervous system1.41e-6581
brain1.55e-6568
future brain1.55e-6568
brain grey matter4.86e-6434
gray matter4.86e-6434
telencephalon6.07e-6434
cerebral hemisphere4.13e-5932
regional part of telencephalon1.29e-5832
nervous system5.19e-5889
regional part of cerebral cortex3.86e-5622
neural plate3.98e-5382
presumptive neural plate3.98e-5382
neocortex1.18e-5020
neurectoderm3.53e-5086
cerebral cortex5.76e-4925
pallium5.76e-4925
pre-chordal neural plate1.14e-4661
adult organism2.77e-44114
ecto-epithelium4.00e-44104
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.88e-32132
ectoderm-derived structure1.80e-29171
ectoderm1.80e-29171
presumptive ectoderm1.80e-29171
organ system subdivision5.96e-21223
tube4.11e-20192
gyrus2.07e-196
basal ganglion1.70e-169
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.70e-169
aggregate regional part of brain1.70e-169
collection of basal ganglia1.70e-169
cerebral subcortex1.70e-169
parietal lobe2.40e-165
temporal lobe3.25e-166
neural nucleus3.66e-169
nucleus of brain3.66e-169
limbic system7.32e-165
anatomical conduit6.38e-14240
corpus striatum2.63e-134
striatum2.63e-134
ventral part of telencephalon2.63e-134
future corpus striatum2.63e-134
brainstem2.92e-126
posterior neural tube8.57e-1215
chordal neural plate8.57e-1215
organ part1.40e-11218
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.51e-1112
hindbrain1.51e-1112
presumptive hindbrain1.51e-1112
telencephalic nucleus4.42e-117
epithelium1.09e-10306
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.41e-1013
frontal cortex1.61e-103
cell layer1.78e-10309
caudate-putamen2.01e-103
dorsal striatum2.01e-103
occipital lobe3.29e-105
pons7.79e-103
anatomical cluster8.76e-10373
regional part of metencephalon1.62e-089
metencephalon1.62e-089
future metencephalon1.62e-089
amygdala1.40e-072
middle temporal gyrus1.50e-072
middle frontal gyrus1.54e-072
caudate nucleus2.55e-072
future caudate nucleus2.55e-072
diencephalon3.15e-077
future diencephalon3.15e-077
multi-tissue structure3.76e-07342
locus ceruleus3.94e-072
brainstem nucleus3.94e-072
hindbrain nucleus3.94e-072
Ammon's horn4.45e-072
lobe parts of cerebral cortex4.45e-072
hippocampal formation4.45e-072
limbic lobe4.45e-072
pituitary gland4.59e-072
meninx8.14e-072
membrane organ8.14e-072
meningeal cluster8.14e-072


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HNF4A#3172211.56614518147680.01057585681762490.0390694319329323
HNF4G#3174214.37671126322340.006924169980439180.0293047529516184



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.