Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1149

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:43, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1149_skeletal_spinal_heart_medulla_globus_substantia_penis



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:65207691..65207712,+p@chr11:65207691..65207712
+
Hg19::chr11:65207744..65207759,+p@chr11:65207744..65207759
+
Hg19::chr11:65207800..65207823,+p@chr11:65207800..65207823
+
Hg19::chr11:65207858..65207904,+p@chr11:65207858..65207904
+
Hg19::chr11:65211637..65211674,+p1@MIR612
Hg19::chr1:160113295..160113304,+p@chr1:160113295..160113304
+
Hg19::chr7:158387919..158387949,+p@chr7:158387919..158387949
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism6.46e-19114
neural tube1.15e-1356
neural rod1.15e-1356
future spinal cord1.15e-1356
neural keel1.15e-1356
regional part of nervous system3.88e-1253
regional part of brain3.88e-1253
brain1.62e-1168
future brain1.62e-1168
neurectoderm2.38e-1086
neural plate4.19e-1082
presumptive neural plate4.19e-1082
central nervous system5.09e-1081
regional part of forebrain5.77e-1041
forebrain5.77e-1041
anterior neural tube5.77e-1041
future forebrain5.77e-1041
organ1.20e-09503
brain grey matter2.08e-0934
gray matter2.08e-0934
nervous system2.50e-0989
telencephalon1.84e-0834
regional part of telencephalon4.02e-0832
cerebral hemisphere1.47e-0732
ecto-epithelium1.53e-07104
neural nucleus5.01e-079
nucleus of brain5.01e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105155.693676875589150.0005232725145542180.00453226556207729
ZNF274#107821203.1065934065930.004913225795274310.022987742533494



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.