Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3301

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:51, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr2:112208115..112208174,-p1@Tmem85
Mm9::chr5:73684033..73684058,+p1@Ociad1
Mm9::chr5:73684060..73684085,+p2@Ociad1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical conduit9.95e-15122
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.18e-1492
regional part of nervous system1.19e-1354
tube1.57e-13114
neural tube1.37e-1252
neural rod1.37e-1252
future spinal cord1.37e-1252
neural keel1.37e-1252
nervous system2.92e-1075
brain3.33e-1047
future brain3.33e-1047
central nervous system8.47e-1073
regional part of brain9.45e-1046
neurectoderm1.64e-0964
neural plate1.64e-0964
presumptive neural plate1.64e-0964
gray matter5.18e-0934
ectoderm-derived structure2.43e-0895
ectoderm2.43e-0895
presumptive ectoderm2.43e-0895
ecto-epithelium3.03e-0873
occipital lobe2.24e-0710
visual cortex2.24e-0710
neocortex2.24e-0710
posterior neural tube2.56e-0712
chordal neural plate2.56e-0712
anterior neural tube3.30e-0740
brain grey matter7.37e-0729
regional part of telencephalon7.37e-0729
telencephalon7.37e-0729


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}