Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2055

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:51, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr13:115892080..115892098,-p8@Itga1
Mm9::chr13:115892099..115892115,-p7@Itga1
Mm9::chr13:115892117..115892192,-p1@Itga1
p2@Pelo
Mm9::chr13:115892346..115892349,-p3@Pelo
p6@Itga1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0045123cellular extravasation0.0420625964667196
GO:0030593neutrophil chemotaxis0.0420625964667196
GO:0030595leukocyte chemotaxis0.0443908907933788
GO:0050900leukocyte migration0.0476422039798344
GO:0008305integrin complex0.0476422039798344



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
autonomic neuron6.07e-079

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.13e-1133
cardiovascular system1.75e-0923
circulatory system1.75e-0923
epithelial fold2.84e-0920
primary circulatory organ3.76e-0918
heart3.76e-0918
primitive heart tube3.76e-0918
primary heart field3.76e-0918
anterior lateral plate mesoderm3.76e-0918
heart tube3.76e-0918
heart primordium3.76e-0918
cardiac mesoderm3.76e-0918
cardiogenic plate3.76e-0918
heart rudiment3.76e-0918
lung5.84e-0814
respiratory tube5.84e-0814
respiration organ5.84e-0814
pair of lungs5.84e-0814
lung primordium5.84e-0814
lung bud5.84e-0814
compound organ1.64e-0743
multi-cellular organism2.06e-07333
epithelial bud2.08e-0717
trunk region element2.56e-0779
trunk3.29e-0790
autonomic nervous system6.07e-079


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}