Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:552

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:52, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:4795834..4795904,+p2@Syne1
Mm9::chr10:5151486..5151504,+p10@Syne1
Mm9::chr10:9620958..9621048,-p1@Stxbp5
Mm9::chr13:41701236..41701271,+p1@Tmem170b
Mm9::chr16:22657321..22657333,-p4@Dgkg
Mm9::chr19:10599672..10599687,-p3@Sdhaf2
Mm9::chr1:23389988..23390064,-p1@Ogfrl1
Mm9::chr2:23904348..23904366,-p1@Hnmt
Mm9::chr2:23904377..23904388,-p3@Hnmt
Mm9::chr4:70195938..70196021,-p1@Megf9
Mm9::chr8:122638044..122638076,+p1@6430548M08Rik
Mm9::chr9:105397367..105397447,-p1@Atp2c1
Mm9::chr9:41932351..41932358,-p4@Sorl1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system9.22e-1254
ecto-epithelium2.99e-1173
neurectoderm6.41e-1164
neural plate6.41e-1164
presumptive neural plate6.41e-1164
neural tube8.18e-1152
neural rod8.18e-1152
future spinal cord8.18e-1152
neural keel8.18e-1152
gray matter2.33e-1034
ectoderm-derived structure4.42e-1095
ectoderm4.42e-1095
presumptive ectoderm4.42e-1095
central nervous system1.15e-0973
anatomical conduit3.43e-09122
nervous system6.84e-0975
brain8.29e-0947
future brain8.29e-0947
regional part of brain2.39e-0846
pre-chordal neural plate2.55e-0849
brain grey matter3.05e-0829
regional part of telencephalon3.05e-0829
telencephalon3.05e-0829
anterior neural tube5.82e-0840
tube6.09e-08114
regional part of forebrain1.65e-0739
forebrain1.65e-0739
future forebrain1.65e-0739
occipital lobe1.77e-0710
visual cortex1.77e-0710
neocortex1.77e-0710
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest4.86e-0792


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}