Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:653

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:12, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:48613859..48613871,+p1@Gnb2l1
Mm9::chr17:27772183..27772212,-p1@Rps10
Mm9::chr1:63223693..63223719,+p1@Eef1b2
Mm9::chr2:38860646..38860665,-p1@Rpl35
Mm9::chr6:115758754..115758772,-p1@Gm6251
p1@LOC100504872
p1@Rpl32
Mm9::chr7:106632155..106632164,-p1@Rps3
Mm9::chr7:13507664..13507669,+p1@Rps5
Mm9::chr7:148364406..148364417,-p@chr7:148364406..148364417
-
Mm9::chr7:29766806..29766840,-p1@Eif3k
Mm9::chr7:31270201..31270202,-p@chr7:31270201..31270202
-
Mm9::chr7:52384095..52384117,-p1@Rpl13a


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0003735structural constituent of ribosome2.14227013399588e-07
GO:0006412translation2.14227013399588e-07
GO:0009059macromolecule biosynthetic process1.62782180421349e-06
GO:0044249cellular biosynthetic process6.19899724867458e-06
GO:0005840ribosome7.3803168895522e-06
GO:0030529ribonucleoprotein complex7.3803168895522e-06
GO:0032991macromolecular complex1.74087010791727e-05
GO:0009058biosynthetic process1.8565482700779e-05
GO:0033279ribosomal subunit2.34000542491042e-05
GO:0005737cytoplasm0.000524415379759629
GO:0015935small ribosomal subunit0.000673866954367357
GO:0044267cellular protein metabolic process0.00146823999856862
GO:0044260cellular macromolecule metabolic process0.00146823999856862
GO:0010467gene expression0.00146823999856862
GO:0019538protein metabolic process0.00156058478201128
GO:0008135translation factor activity, nucleic acid binding0.00697090241983966
GO:0044424intracellular part0.0112810809464035
GO:0005853eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 complex0.0112810809464035
GO:0043232intracellular non-membrane-bound organelle0.0112810809464035
GO:0043228non-membrane-bound organelle0.0112810809464035
GO:0005622intracellular0.0127110624320008
GO:0043234protein complex0.0127110624320008
GO:0022613ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis and assembly0.0127110624320008
GO:0005080protein kinase C binding0.0130239586364739
GO:0044444cytoplasmic part0.0192100984712154
GO:0007205protein kinase C activation0.0205895928338391
GO:0043170macromolecule metabolic process0.036778582067945
GO:0007200G-protein signaling, coupled to IP3 second messenger (phospholipase C activating)0.0458200732709139
GO:0032147activation of protein kinase activity0.0458200732709139
GO:0003746translation elongation factor activity0.0458200732709139
GO:0015934large ribosomal subunit0.0458200732709139
GO:0005834heterotrimeric G-protein complex0.0458200732709139



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:



"{{{coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median}}}" is not a number.

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}