Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2828

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:28, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2828_Wilms_normal_Retinal_rhabdomyosarcoma_Hair_liposarcoma_glioblastoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:75912926..75912939,-p@chr5:75912926..75912939
-
Hg19::chr5:75919155..75919191,-p3@F2RL2
Hg19::chr5:75919192..75919215,-p1@F2RL2
Hg19::chr5:75919217..75919250,-p2@F2RL2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision1.42e-18264
multi-tissue structure8.94e-15342
dense mesenchyme tissue1.56e-1473
somite3.64e-1471
presomitic mesoderm3.64e-1471
presumptive segmental plate3.64e-1471
dermomyotome3.64e-1471
trunk paraxial mesoderm3.64e-1471
epithelial vesicle5.38e-1478
mesenchyme5.59e-14160
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.59e-14160
paraxial mesoderm5.68e-1472
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.68e-1472
cell layer2.73e-12309
muscle tissue4.23e-1264
musculature4.23e-1264
musculature of body4.23e-1264
skeletal muscle tissue5.46e-1262
striated muscle tissue5.46e-1262
myotome5.46e-1262
epithelium6.83e-12306
unilaminar epithelium1.03e-11148
trunk mesenchyme1.16e-11122
multi-cellular organism2.45e-11656
trunk4.77e-11199
epithelial tube5.22e-11117
anatomical cluster9.42e-11373
vasculature9.97e-1178
vascular system9.97e-1178
anatomical system6.95e-10624
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm9.44e-1083
anatomical group1.09e-09625
multilaminar epithelium1.25e-0983
artery3.11e-0942
arterial blood vessel3.11e-0942
arterial system3.11e-0942
subdivision of head9.75e-0949
epithelial tube open at both ends1.29e-0859
blood vessel1.29e-0859
blood vasculature1.29e-0859
vascular cord1.29e-0859
systemic artery3.13e-0833
systemic arterial system3.13e-0833
circulatory system8.50e-08112
anatomical conduit9.64e-08240
cardiovascular system1.02e-07109
vessel1.27e-0768
surface structure3.34e-0799
head3.77e-0756
pigment epithelium of eye7.26e-0711
anterior region of body7.29e-0762
craniocervical region7.29e-0762


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOS#235336.74846648167080.005032452776317940.0234740659002175
TRIM28#10155313.94289378394690.0005972858184258420.00499679057918748



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.