Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2817

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:27, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2817_Natural_CD8_CD4_CD34_Basophils_thymus_CD14



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:162932997..162933017,+p@chr5:162932997..162933017
+
Hg19::chr5:43019699..43019711,-p@chr5:43019699..43019711
-
Hg19::chr5:43019717..43019732,-p@chr5:43019717..43019732
-
Hg19::chr5:43041092..43041124,+p@chr5:43041092..43041124
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell2.64e-56168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.64e-56168
hematopoietic cell3.06e-54177
leukocyte5.56e-54136
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.64e-51161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.64e-51161
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.46e-50120
nongranular leukocyte8.22e-49115
nucleate cell2.66e-3155
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.17e-3152
lymphocyte4.77e-3053
common lymphoid progenitor4.77e-3053
myeloid cell1.81e-21108
common myeloid progenitor1.81e-21108
myeloid leukocyte4.87e-2072
classical monocyte1.37e-1942
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.37e-1942
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.10e-1966
T cell2.29e-1825
pro-T cell2.29e-1825
mature alpha-beta T cell4.03e-1818
alpha-beta T cell4.03e-1818
immature T cell4.03e-1818
mature T cell4.03e-1818
immature alpha-beta T cell4.03e-1818
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell9.27e-1867
monopoietic cell8.97e-1759
monocyte8.97e-1759
monoblast8.97e-1759
promonocyte8.97e-1759
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor9.25e-1761
defensive cell2.48e-1648
phagocyte2.48e-1648
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.45e-1211
lymphocyte of B lineage3.24e-1124
pro-B cell3.24e-1124
B cell8.14e-1114
mesenchymal cell1.08e-09354
connective tissue cell7.55e-09361
intermediate monocyte5.45e-089
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte5.45e-089
motile cell1.28e-07386
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell5.86e-076
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.23e-2798
blood island2.23e-2798
hemolymphoid system1.17e-25108
immune system2.35e-1893
bone marrow1.06e-1576
bone element5.22e-1482
skeletal element2.54e-1190
blood2.93e-0915
haemolymphatic fluid2.93e-0915
organism substance2.93e-0915
skeletal system1.09e-08100
connective tissue2.68e-08371
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer9.23e-0751
immune system cancer9.23e-0751


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
GTF2F1#296239.554745657568240.001820362319304780.0109024441028714
SMARCB1#6598418.25271578115749.00423392720929e-060.000242057448423117
SMARCC2#6601370.61653082017324.74678670742709e-060.000147281538008609
SUZ12#23512225.05789045553150.002325256716520610.013186766193348
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.032309437991943
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244885958295671



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.