Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2682

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:18, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2682_Eosinophils_Basophils_CD14_CD14CD16_Peripheral_CD133_Mast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:208007936..208007953,-p@chr2:208007936..208007953
-
Hg19::chr2:208007962..208007989,-p@chr2:208007962..208007989
-
Hg19::chr2:208576043..208576068,-p@chr2:208576043..208576068
-
Hg19::chr6:163834358..163834378,+p@chr6:163834358..163834378
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.20e-65136
myeloid leukocyte3.92e-5972
hematopoietic stem cell1.30e-58168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.30e-58168
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.64e-5567
hematopoietic cell1.03e-53177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.01e-53161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.01e-53161
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.09e-52120
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.68e-5266
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.11e-5161
myeloid cell2.78e-50108
common myeloid progenitor2.78e-50108
monopoietic cell4.21e-4959
monocyte4.21e-4959
monoblast4.21e-4959
promonocyte4.21e-4959
nongranular leukocyte7.08e-49115
classical monocyte4.21e-4842
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.21e-4842
defensive cell7.70e-4848
phagocyte7.70e-4848
stuff accumulating cell2.53e-2087
mesenchymal cell4.89e-16354
connective tissue cell4.58e-15361
motile cell1.89e-13386
intermediate monocyte1.05e-129
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.05e-129
stem cell8.41e-12441
multi fate stem cell2.31e-11427
somatic stem cell4.01e-11433
dendritic cell7.25e-0910
conventional dendritic cell4.72e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.71e-5298
blood island2.71e-5298
hemolymphoid system2.43e-50108
immune system6.44e-5093
bone marrow1.18e-4976
bone element8.16e-4682
skeletal element1.26e-3990
skeletal system2.51e-33100
lateral plate mesoderm2.30e-16203
connective tissue3.05e-15371
musculoskeletal system3.01e-13167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SPI1#668836.153242631392040.006580387113059030.028106046527923



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.