Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2137

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:06, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2137_CD14_mesenchymal_Melanocyte_chronic_acute_anaplastic_bile



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:57176694..57176742,-p6@SLC43A3
Hg19::chr11:57182508..57182521,-p@chr11:57182508..57182521
-
Hg19::chr11:57193110..57193132,-p@chr11:57193110..57193132
-
Hg19::chr11:57194550..57194617,-p1@SLC43A3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid cell6.63e-30108
common myeloid progenitor6.63e-30108
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.15e-2466
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell5.39e-2467
defensive cell1.20e-2348
phagocyte1.20e-2348
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.27e-2361
monopoietic cell5.48e-2359
monocyte5.48e-2359
monoblast5.48e-2359
promonocyte5.48e-2359
classical monocyte2.04e-2042
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.04e-2042
myeloid leukocyte2.26e-2072
somatic cell1.23e-19588
somatic stem cell1.10e-18433
multi fate stem cell1.84e-18427
stem cell3.54e-18441
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.66e-17161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.66e-17161
hematopoietic stem cell1.03e-16168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.03e-16168
motile cell2.41e-16386
hematopoietic cell2.89e-16177
animal cell1.28e-15679
eukaryotic cell1.28e-15679
stuff accumulating cell1.94e-1587
mesenchymal cell1.98e-15354
connective tissue cell3.78e-15361
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell4.49e-11120
nongranular leukocyte2.27e-09115
leukocyte8.17e-09136
native cell2.01e-08722
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow7.57e-2376
immune system6.38e-2293
bone element3.51e-2082
skeletal element2.20e-1790
hemolymphoid system2.49e-17108
hematopoietic system5.49e-1798
blood island5.49e-1798
musculoskeletal system8.58e-16167
skeletal system1.39e-15100
connective tissue1.06e-14371
lateral plate mesoderm1.10e-11203
mesoderm2.14e-11315
mesoderm-derived structure2.14e-11315
presumptive mesoderm2.14e-11315
tissue3.32e-07773
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer4.25e-1451
immune system cancer4.25e-1451
leukemia6.85e-1439
myeloid leukemia5.29e-1231


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.