Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4740

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:55, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4740_granulosa_caudate_putamen_occipital_neuroepithelioma_stomach_Hepatocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:18871159..18871201,-p3@PSD3
Hg19::chr8:18871203..18871275,-p1@PSD3
Hg19::chr8:18871287..18871316,-p5@PSD3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
non-terminally differentiated cell5.84e-10180
muscle cell6.72e-0754
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-tissue structure2.88e-22347
epithelium4.44e-22309
cell layer1.08e-21312
organism subdivision7.42e-21365
multi-cellular organism6.34e-19659
embryo2.75e-18612
anatomical conduit1.28e-17241
regional part of nervous system1.90e-1794
nervous system1.90e-1794
anatomical system2.00e-17625
embryonic structure2.09e-17605
developing anatomical structure2.09e-17605
germ layer2.81e-17604
embryonic tissue2.81e-17604
presumptive structure2.81e-17604
epiblast (generic)2.81e-17604
anatomical group4.86e-17626
tube6.66e-17194
anatomical cluster2.91e-16286
central nervous system1.50e-1482
brain3.97e-1469
future brain3.97e-1469
ectoderm5.42e-14173
presumptive ectoderm5.42e-14173
head1.76e-13123
ectoderm-derived structure2.29e-13169
anterior region of body1.77e-12129
craniocervical region1.77e-12129
neurectoderm5.19e-1290
regional part of brain1.15e-1159
neural tube2.05e-1157
neural rod2.05e-1157
future spinal cord2.05e-1157
neural keel2.05e-1157
neural plate2.12e-1186
presumptive neural plate2.12e-1186
pre-chordal neural plate1.19e-1061
organ2.07e-10511
regional part of forebrain5.96e-1041
forebrain5.96e-1041
future forebrain5.96e-1041
gray matter6.53e-1034
brain grey matter6.53e-1034
regional part of telencephalon6.68e-1033
telencephalon7.10e-1034
anterior neural tube9.23e-1042
cerebral hemisphere1.37e-0932
primordium6.29e-09168
unilaminar epithelium4.54e-07138
cerebral cortex5.10e-0725
pallium5.10e-0725
trunk mesenchyme8.89e-07143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0281450761186175
CTCFL#140690319.74647435897440.0001298372005551160.00172388347174877
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0327899680389007
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0324497299617005
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0187467064835715
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00668940900527135
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00310968226245656
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00545957115183967
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00249595130345174
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00619153134360552



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.