Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4307

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:25, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4307_CD14_lymphoma_splenic_appendix_b_myeloma_cord



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:183208298..183208302,-p@chr3:183208298..183208302
-
Hg19::chr3:183273436..183273469,-p2@KLHL6
Hg19::chr3:183273483..183273504,-p1@KLHL6


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell3.14e-78172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.14e-78172
hematopoietic cell8.28e-76182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.75e-74165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.75e-74165
leukocyte1.08e-67140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.12e-59124
nongranular leukocyte2.02e-59119
myeloid cell7.01e-43112
common myeloid progenitor7.01e-43112
myeloid leukocyte2.62e-3576
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.74e-3270
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.15e-3171
monopoietic cell3.65e-2963
monocyte3.65e-2963
monoblast3.65e-2963
promonocyte3.65e-2963
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.87e-2865
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.47e-2742
lymphocyte9.57e-2753
common lymphoid progenitor9.57e-2753
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.77e-2652
classical monocyte1.18e-2445
lymphocyte of B lineage1.27e-1424
pro-B cell1.27e-1424
T cell1.20e-1125
pro-T cell1.20e-1125
mesenchymal cell1.80e-10358
connective tissue cell2.60e-09365
mature alpha-beta T cell3.44e-0918
alpha-beta T cell3.44e-0918
immature T cell3.44e-0918
mature T cell3.44e-0918
immature alpha-beta T cell3.44e-0918
B cell2.84e-0814
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system6.04e-41112
hematopoietic system3.12e-40102
blood island3.12e-40102
bone marrow3.74e-2780
immune system6.23e-26115
bone element5.23e-2386
adult organism9.53e-19115
skeletal element5.04e-16101
skeletal system5.04e-16101
lateral plate mesoderm7.21e-16216
blood3.71e-1015
haemolymphatic fluid3.71e-1015
organism substance3.71e-1015
connective tissue4.16e-08375
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer1.33e-1451
immune system cancer1.33e-1451
leukemia4.22e-1139
myeloid leukemia4.50e-0831


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BATF#10538216.23853452820240.004917462407809970.0230034424621189
MEF2A#4205212.4954872730960.008235029478029740.0324942664219415
PBX3#5090214.60967512449610.006056122473217890.0268529920599645
ZEB1#6935211.25895467836260.01010222676646330.0378214246222634



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.