Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2828

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:38, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2828_Wilms_normal_Retinal_rhabdomyosarcoma_Hair_liposarcoma_glioblastoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:75912926..75912939,-p@chr5:75912926..75912939
-
Hg19::chr5:75919155..75919191,-p3@F2RL2
Hg19::chr5:75919192..75919215,-p1@F2RL2
Hg19::chr5:75919217..75919250,-p2@F2RL2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision9.26e-19365
somite2.18e-1683
paraxial mesoderm2.18e-1683
presomitic mesoderm2.18e-1683
presumptive segmental plate2.18e-1683
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.18e-1683
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.18e-1683
trunk mesenchyme1.13e-15143
multi-tissue structure2.26e-15347
trunk8.62e-14216
dermomyotome1.19e-1370
epithelial tube3.38e-12118
cell layer4.40e-12312
vasculature7.49e-1279
vascular system7.49e-1279
epithelium1.01e-11309
muscle tissue1.53e-1163
musculature1.53e-1163
musculature of body1.53e-1163
skeletal muscle tissue1.68e-1161
striated muscle tissue1.68e-1161
myotome1.68e-1161
multi-cellular organism1.69e-11659
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm7.82e-1184
unilaminar epithelium2.73e-10138
anatomical cluster7.92e-10286
blood vessel8.13e-1060
epithelial tube open at both ends8.13e-1060
blood vasculature8.13e-1060
vascular cord8.13e-1060
artery1.94e-0942
arterial blood vessel1.94e-0942
arterial system1.94e-0942
multilaminar epithelium2.13e-0982
subdivision of head2.23e-0948
anatomical system3.21e-09625
mesenchyme4.63e-09238
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.63e-09238
anatomical group5.00e-09626
cardiovascular system1.16e-08110
circulatory system1.22e-08113
vessel1.66e-0869
systemic artery2.06e-0833
systemic arterial system2.06e-0833
anatomical conduit2.79e-08241
surface structure1.03e-0795
pigment epithelium of eye4.50e-0711
embryo4.79e-07612
sense organ5.37e-0723
tube6.12e-07194


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.