Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C417

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:45, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C417_HES3GFP_iPS_teratocarcinoma_H9_testicular_prostate_cerebellum



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:98954543..98954552,-p@chr12:98954543..98954552
-
Hg19::chr13:54908893..54908895,+p@chr13:54908893..54908895
+
Hg19::chr15:89537331..89537336,+p@chr15:89537331..89537336
+
Hg19::chr1:232362379..232362384,+p@chr1:232362379..232362384
+
Hg19::chr1:83313885..83313893,-p@chr1:83313885..83313893
-
Hg19::chr3:32907334..32907339,+p@chr3:32907334..32907339
+
Hg19::chr3:62936098..62936110,+p1@ENST00000475886
Hg19::chr4:62615896..62615901,-p@chr4:62615896..62615901
-
Hg19::chr4:93555912..93555916,+p@chr4:93555912..93555916
+
Hg19::chr4:93568059..93568069,+p@chr4:93568059..93568069
+
Hg19::chr4:93600137..93600143,+p@chr4:93600137..93600143
+
Hg19::chr5:147055054..147055055,+p@chr5:147055054..147055055
+
Hg19::chr5:165501125..165501130,-p@chr5:165501125..165501130
-
Hg19::chr5:176069923..176069930,+p4@EIF4E1B
Hg19::chr5:2750472..2750474,+p@chr5:2750472..2750474
+
Hg19::chr9:133826616..133826622,+p@chr9:133826616..133826622
+
Hg19::chr9:79633656..79633659,+p1@FOXB2
Hg19::chrX:113179768..113179772,-p@chrX:113179768..113179772
-
Hg19::chrX:113761667..113761672,-p@chrX:113761667..113761672
-
Hg19::chrX:113815390..113815394,-p@chrX:113815390..113815394
-
Hg19::chrX:121373039..121373041,+p@chrX:121373039..121373041
+
Hg19::chrX:16141567..16141572,+p4@GRPR
Hg19::chrX:16141711..16141725,+p2@GRPR
Hg19::chrX:97971560..97971561,+p@chrX:97971560..97971561
+
Hg19::chrX:98051581..98051584,+p@chrX:98051581..98051584
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004946bombesin receptor activity0.0131867484523018
GO:0008188neuropeptide receptor activity0.048687554451759
GO:0042923neuropeptide binding0.048687554451759
GO:0006413translational initiation0.048687554451759
GO:0003743translation initiation factor activity0.048687554451759
GO:0022618protein-RNA complex assembly0.048687554451759
GO:0030594neurotransmitter receptor activity0.048687554451759
GO:0042165neurotransmitter binding0.048687554451759
GO:0001653peptide receptor activity0.048687554451759
GO:0008528peptide receptor activity, G-protein coupled0.048687554451759



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuronal stem cell5.34e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system1.32e-2782
regional part of nervous system4.47e-2694
nervous system4.47e-2694
neural tube5.08e-2557
neural rod5.08e-2557
future spinal cord5.08e-2557
neural keel5.08e-2557
anterior neural tube1.79e-2042
brain3.05e-2069
future brain3.05e-2069
regional part of brain3.93e-2059
regional part of forebrain4.05e-2041
forebrain4.05e-2041
future forebrain4.05e-2041
gray matter1.53e-1934
brain grey matter1.53e-1934
telencephalon2.24e-1934
neural plate6.23e-1986
presumptive neural plate6.23e-1986
regional part of telencephalon9.31e-1933
neurectoderm1.37e-1890
cerebral hemisphere3.43e-1832
ectoderm-derived structure3.22e-15169
ectoderm3.27e-15173
presumptive ectoderm3.27e-15173
pre-chordal neural plate5.26e-1461
cerebral cortex1.17e-1325
pallium1.17e-1325
regional part of cerebral cortex2.72e-1322
head2.08e-12123
neocortex3.24e-1220
anterior region of body4.54e-12129
craniocervical region4.54e-12129
adult organism1.09e-11115
basal ganglion1.69e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.69e-079
aggregate regional part of brain1.69e-079
collection of basal ganglia1.69e-079
cerebral subcortex1.69e-079
nucleus of brain1.84e-079
neural nucleus1.84e-079
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer7.59e-07143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.