Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4853

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:53, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4853_Renal_aorta_Mesenchymal_pituitary_Smooth_Fibroblast_mesothelioma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chrX:140270547..140270568,-p4@LDOC1
Hg19::chrX:140270647..140270745,-p3@LDOC1
Hg19::chrX:140271249..140271333,-p1@LDOC1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical cluster8.97e-32286
organism subdivision3.42e-30365
cell layer3.42e-30312
epithelium7.38e-30309
anatomical conduit2.68e-25241
tube1.58e-23194
multi-tissue structure7.12e-23347
neural tube4.79e-1857
neural rod4.79e-1857
future spinal cord4.79e-1857
neural keel4.79e-1857
neural plate5.36e-1886
presumptive neural plate5.36e-1886
regional part of brain2.85e-1759
central nervous system1.01e-1682
neurectoderm2.35e-1690
brain2.35e-1669
future brain2.35e-1669
head4.46e-16123
ectoderm-derived structure5.89e-16169
pre-chordal neural plate2.05e-1561
multi-cellular organism2.19e-15659
ectoderm5.53e-15173
presumptive ectoderm5.53e-15173
regional part of nervous system5.66e-1594
nervous system5.66e-1594
regional part of forebrain1.36e-1441
forebrain1.36e-1441
future forebrain1.36e-1441
anterior region of body1.52e-14129
craniocervical region1.52e-14129
anterior neural tube2.04e-1442
embryonic structure3.19e-14605
developing anatomical structure3.19e-14605
anatomical group3.24e-14626
anatomical system3.72e-14625
germ layer4.74e-14604
embryonic tissue4.74e-14604
presumptive structure4.74e-14604
epiblast (generic)4.74e-14604
vasculature6.23e-1479
vascular system6.23e-1479
blood vessel2.48e-1360
epithelial tube open at both ends2.48e-1360
blood vasculature2.48e-1360
vascular cord2.48e-1360
artery3.46e-1342
arterial blood vessel3.46e-1342
arterial system3.46e-1342
embryo4.30e-13612
organ part7.31e-13219
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.24e-1284
somite1.29e-1283
paraxial mesoderm1.29e-1283
presomitic mesoderm1.29e-1283
presumptive segmental plate1.29e-1283
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.29e-1283
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.29e-1283
telencephalon1.38e-1234
vessel1.91e-1269
gray matter2.27e-1234
brain grey matter2.27e-1234
dermomyotome2.74e-1270
trunk mesenchyme3.74e-12143
regional part of telencephalon4.03e-1233
cerebral hemisphere6.43e-1232
multilaminar epithelium6.70e-1282
skeletal muscle tissue1.90e-1161
striated muscle tissue1.90e-1161
myotome1.90e-1161
muscle tissue4.03e-1163
musculature4.03e-1163
musculature of body4.03e-1163
trunk9.04e-11216
systemic artery1.46e-1033
systemic arterial system1.46e-1033
epithelial tube3.22e-10118
regional part of cerebral cortex3.30e-1022
cerebral cortex9.23e-1025
pallium9.23e-1025
neocortex1.30e-0920
adult organism5.26e-09115
cardiovascular system1.75e-08110
unilaminar epithelium6.44e-08138


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.