Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C953

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:59, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C953_Synoviocyte_Olfactory_Lens_embryonic_eye_rectum_tenocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:151670237..151670275,-p@chr6:151670237..151670275
-
Hg19::chr6:151670325..151670388,-p@chr6:151670325..151670388
-
Hg19::chr6:151670495..151670565,-p@chr6:151670495..151670565
-
Hg19::chr6:151671044..151671077,-p@chr6:151671044..151671077
-
Hg19::chr6:151671119..151671166,-p@chr6:151671119..151671166
-
Hg19::chr6:151671321..151671355,-p@chr6:151671321..151671355
-
Hg19::chr6:151671408..151671451,-p@chr6:151671408..151671451
-
Hg19::chr6:151671486..151671529,-p@chr6:151671486..151671529
-
Hg19::chr6:151678864..151678868,+p6@AKAP12


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cell layer1.10e-21312
epithelium5.24e-21309
anatomical cluster7.96e-18286
multi-cellular organism1.32e-17659
multi-tissue structure2.47e-17347
organism subdivision2.43e-16365
anatomical conduit9.38e-16241
embryo4.35e-15612
tube1.10e-14194
anatomical system1.91e-14625
anatomical group3.81e-14626
embryonic structure1.50e-13605
developing anatomical structure1.50e-13605
germ layer3.42e-13604
embryonic tissue3.42e-13604
presumptive structure3.42e-13604
epiblast (generic)3.42e-13604
vasculature4.14e-1379
vascular system4.14e-1379
neural plate2.89e-1086
presumptive neural plate2.89e-1086
regional part of nervous system3.76e-1094
nervous system3.76e-1094
vessel4.54e-1069
trunk mesenchyme6.09e-10143
central nervous system7.19e-1082
neurectoderm9.60e-1090
trunk1.38e-09216
epithelial tube2.05e-09118
blood vessel2.72e-0960
epithelial tube open at both ends2.72e-0960
blood vasculature2.72e-0960
vascular cord2.72e-0960
cardiovascular system3.60e-09110
circulatory system4.38e-09113
unilaminar epithelium4.81e-09138
multilaminar epithelium7.41e-0982
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.16e-0884
somite1.20e-0883
paraxial mesoderm1.20e-0883
presomitic mesoderm1.20e-0883
presumptive segmental plate1.20e-0883
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.20e-0883
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.20e-0883
dermomyotome1.39e-0870
muscle tissue3.77e-0863
musculature3.77e-0863
musculature of body3.77e-0863
regional part of brain3.99e-0859
brain4.19e-0869
future brain4.19e-0869
skeletal muscle tissue7.51e-0861
striated muscle tissue7.51e-0861
myotome7.51e-0861
neural tube9.35e-0857
neural rod9.35e-0857
future spinal cord9.35e-0857
neural keel9.35e-0857
organ part4.14e-07219
head4.91e-07123
artery5.35e-0742
arterial blood vessel5.35e-0742
arterial system5.35e-0742
ectoderm-derived structure6.79e-07169
body cavity precursor7.03e-0763
pre-chordal neural plate8.83e-0761
squamous epithelium9.95e-0725


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.