Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C357

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:39, 18 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C357_Endothelial_Lymphatic_Renal_Hepatic_seminal_breast_heart



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:45477877..45477901,+p2@RASSF4
Hg19::chr14:51863894..51863903,-p1@ENST00000556762
Hg19::chr15:65398647..65398656,-p3@UBAP1L
Hg19::chr15:65935213..65935234,+p8@SLC24A1
Hg19::chr15:65935239..65935275,+p6@SLC24A1
Hg19::chr15:65935283..65935297,+p11@SLC24A1
Hg19::chr18:54339814..54339822,+p7@WDR7
Hg19::chr18:54339823..54339834,+p8@WDR7
Hg19::chr19:42006553..42006555,-p1@LOC100505495
Hg19::chr19:4639579..4639589,+p2@TNFAIP8L1
Hg19::chr1:1148395..1148419,-p@chr1:1148395..1148419
-
Hg19::chr1:214453986..214454002,+p10@SMYD2
Hg19::chr1:94526344..94526353,-p4@ABCA4
Hg19::chr1:94526365..94526386,-p2@ABCA4
Hg19::chr20:62679771..62679782,-p4@SOX18
Hg19::chr22:43042678..43042692,-p3@CYB5R3
Hg19::chr2:127413798..127413819,+p3@GYPC
Hg19::chr2:33661536..33661549,+p17@RASGRP3
Hg19::chr2:71681572..71681579,-p@chr2:71681572..71681579
-
Hg19::chr3:194868625..194868636,+p2@ENST00000426468
Hg19::chr3:194868639..194868654,+p1@ENST00000426468
Hg19::chr3:30560333..30560348,+p@chr3:30560333..30560348
+
Hg19::chr3:30560368..30560379,+p@chr3:30560368..30560379
+
Hg19::chr4:146403815..146403832,-p1@BC035666
Hg19::chr4:146403984..146404001,-p1@AK023324
Hg19::chr4:146404016..146404030,-p2@AK023324
Hg19::chr4:189881560..189881604,-p@chr4:189881560..189881604
-
Hg19::chr6:168195926..168195943,+p1@LOC441179
Hg19::chr6:168195978..168195989,+p3@LOC441179
Hg19::chr8:21924052..21924103,+p6@EPB49
Hg19::chrX:107068687..107068703,+p6@MID2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0009416response to light stimulus0.025522668176794
GO:0006649phospholipid transfer to membrane0.025522668176794
GO:0009642response to light intensity0.025522668176794
GO:0019867outer membrane0.025522668176794
GO:0009314response to radiation0.025522668176794
GO:0005887integral to plasma membrane0.025522668176794
GO:0031226intrinsic to plasma membrane0.025522668176794
GO:0008273calcium, potassium:sodium antiporter activity0.0297804699504777
GO:0046582Rap GTPase activator activity0.0297804699504777
GO:0009628response to abiotic stimulus0.0324830039881413
GO:0007603phototransduction, visible light0.0324830039881413
GO:0004128cytochrome-b5 reductase activity0.0417498825370661
GO:0016653oxidoreductase activity, acting on NADH or NADPH, heme protein as acceptor0.0417498825370661
GO:0007601visual perception0.0417498825370661
GO:0050953sensory perception of light stimulus0.0417498825370661
GO:0015674di-, tri-valent inorganic cation transport0.0478365347063914



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.