Coexpression cluster:C899

Full id: C899_pituitary_cerebellum_occipital_parietal_testicular_brain_temporal

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr13:26042960..26043015,+	p2@ATP8A2
Hg19::chr14:74185796..74185825,-	p1@AK308604
Hg19::chr16:2136434..2136445,+	p@chr16:2136434..2136445 +
Hg19::chr16:87369953..87369959,-	p@chr16:87369953..87369959 -
Hg19::chr2:203735519..203735539,-	p8@ICA1L
Hg19::chr2:203735586..203735600,-	p14@ICA1L
Hg19::chr9:14662234..14662273,-	p@chr9:14662234..14662273 -
Hg19::chr9:74061853..74061893,-	p7@TRPM3
Hg19::chr9:74061895..74061905,-	p14@TRPM3

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

GO ID	GO name	FDR corrected p-value
GO:0004012	phospholipid-translocating ATPase activity	0.0218266084661406
GO:0015247	aminophospholipid transporter activity	0.0218266084661406
GO:0015914	phospholipid transport	0.0218266084661406
GO:0015075	ion transmembrane transporter activity	0.0218266084661406
GO:0005548	phospholipid transporter activity	0.0218266084661406
GO:0022891	substrate-specific transmembrane transporter activity	0.0218266084661406
GO:0022857	transmembrane transporter activity	0.0218266084661406
GO:0022892	substrate-specific transporter activity	0.0222822945446405
GO:0005319	lipid transporter activity	0.0413879448357098
GO:0005262	calcium channel activity	0.0461577732564526
GO:0006869	lipid transport	0.0468509204505933
GO:0015662	ATPase activity, coupled to transmembrane movement of ions, phosphorylative mechanism	0.0468509204505933
GO:0006816	calcium ion transport	0.0488370558464889
GO:0042625	ATPase activity, coupled to transmembrane movement of ions	0.0488370558464889
GO:0008285	negative regulation of cell proliferation	0.0488370558464889
GO:0006810	transport	0.0488370558464889
GO:0015674	di-, tri-valent inorganic cation transport	0.0488370558464889
GO:0051234	establishment of localization	0.0488370558464889
GO:0042626	ATPase activity, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances	0.0488370558464889
GO:0043492	ATPase activity, coupled to movement of substances	0.0488370558464889
GO:0016820	hydrolase activity, acting on acid anhydrides, catalyzing transmembrane movement of substances	0.0488370558464889
GO:0051179	localization	0.0488370558464889
GO:0015405	P-P-bond-hydrolysis-driven transmembrane transporter activity	0.0488370558464889
GO:0015399	primary active transmembrane transporter activity	0.0488370558464889

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.