Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C623

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:41, 18 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C623_Dendritic_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_Whole_Macrophage_CD14_Basophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:85779986..85780014,-p3@PICALM
Hg19::chr11:85780015..85780042,-p2@PICALM
Hg19::chr12:15114191..15114233,-p5@ARHGDIB
Hg19::chr12:8276205..8276219,+p2@CLEC4A
Hg19::chr12:8276224..8276237,+p3@CLEC4A
Hg19::chr14:93581500..93581509,-p12@ITPK1
Hg19::chr16:28192360..28192372,-p3@AB384470
Hg19::chr16:31271322..31271339,+p2@ITGAM
Hg19::chr16:8738211..8738249,+p@chr16:8738211..8738249
+
Hg19::chr16:8738462..8738501,+p@chr16:8738462..8738501
+
Hg19::chr16:90023641..90023698,+p@chr16:90023641..90023698
+
Hg19::chr3:149531627..149531651,+p7@RNF13
Hg19::chr5:142193841..142193874,+p@chr5:142193841..142193874
+
Hg19::chr8:38662960..38663003,+p9@TACC1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0035300inositol trisphosphate 5/6-kinase activity0.0113730683144134
GO:0043647inositol phosphate metabolic process0.0113730683144134
GO:0051765inositol tetrakisphosphate kinase activity0.0113730683144134
GO:0032957inositol trisphosphate metabolic process0.0113730683144134
GO:0047325inositol tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase activity0.0113730683144134
GO:0022610biological adhesion0.0142547691685994
GO:0007155cell adhesion0.0142547691685994
GO:0001948glycoprotein binding0.0213169715519573
GO:0048268clathrin cage assembly0.0227340873511213
GO:0006901vesicle coating0.0227340873511213
GO:0006900membrane budding0.02324871800575
GO:0030276clathrin binding0.0260425749057417
GO:0006020inositol metabolic process0.0266215290817958
GO:0051766inositol trisphosphate kinase activity0.0266215290817958
GO:0031410cytoplasmic vesicle0.0266215290817958
GO:0031982vesicle0.0266215290817958
GO:0016050vesicle organization and biogenesis0.0266215290817958
GO:0000287magnesium ion binding0.0266215290817958
GO:0005545phosphatidylinositol binding0.0269705183200261
GO:0005094Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor activity0.0269705183200261
GO:0007162negative regulation of cell adhesion0.0351278293777307
GO:0005092GDP-dissociation inhibitor activity0.036104050016986
GO:0006898receptor-mediated endocytosis0.0487274734501486
GO:0044459plasma membrane part0.0487274734501486
GO:0005905coated pit0.0487274734501486



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.