Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3009: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.346912934985113,

Latest revision as of 12:17, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3009_optic_substantia_thalamus_globus_spinal_mature_Mast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:24914220..24914234,-p@chr10:24914220..24914234
-
Hg19::chr10:25012800..25012822,-p1@ARHGAP21
Hg19::chr10:25012828..25012860,-p2@ARHGAP21


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast3.74e-0876
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
ectoderm-derived structure2.09e-26171
ectoderm2.09e-26171
presumptive ectoderm2.09e-26171
neural tube2.65e-2656
neural rod2.65e-2656
future spinal cord2.65e-2656
neural keel2.65e-2656
nervous system1.96e-2589
central nervous system2.59e-2581
regional part of nervous system1.97e-2453
regional part of brain1.97e-2453
brain3.40e-2368
future brain3.40e-2368
multi-cellular organism3.26e-22656
regional part of forebrain8.66e-2241
forebrain8.66e-2241
anterior neural tube8.66e-2241
future forebrain8.66e-2241
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.36e-21132
adult organism1.49e-21114
brain grey matter2.90e-2134
gray matter2.90e-2134
telencephalon3.46e-2134
regional part of telencephalon6.11e-2032
cerebral hemisphere8.17e-2032
neural plate1.72e-1982
presumptive neural plate1.72e-1982
anatomical system1.88e-19624
neurectoderm3.16e-1986
anatomical group5.15e-19625
ecto-epithelium2.41e-18104
cerebral cortex1.10e-1525
pallium1.10e-1525
embryonic structure1.24e-15564
organ4.99e-15503
organ system subdivision5.85e-15223
germ layer8.72e-15560
germ layer / neural crest8.72e-15560
embryonic tissue8.72e-15560
presumptive structure8.72e-15560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure8.72e-15560
epiblast (generic)8.72e-15560
regional part of cerebral cortex1.98e-1422
developing anatomical structure4.09e-14581
pre-chordal neural plate1.51e-1361
neocortex3.22e-1320
embryo7.09e-13592
anatomical cluster5.94e-12373
multi-tissue structure8.57e-11342
anatomical conduit7.91e-10240
organ part7.68e-09218
cell layer1.24e-07309
epithelium1.25e-07306
tissue2.88e-07773
neural nucleus4.77e-079
nucleus of brain4.77e-079
basal ganglion6.09e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis6.09e-079
aggregate regional part of brain6.09e-079
collection of basal ganglia6.09e-079
cerebral subcortex6.09e-079
tube6.94e-07192


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.708947
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.758317
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.11.89908
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.904546
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.59304
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.04561
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.11.79391
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.752137
MA0146.11.70974
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.21.15986
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.14.15415
MA0155.12.02721
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.8915
MA0163.11.2663
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.26.30148
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.